archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <>
To: Rob Landley <>
Cc: <>
Subject: Re: Messing with Kconfig.
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:35:37 +0200 (MET DST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Rob Landley wrote:

> 5) Is the indentation level supposed to mean something?  Look at PCI IDE
> chipset support, for example.  Disable it and the indented menu items under
> it disappear, along with a dozen or so menu items underneath it that aren't
> indented.  Am I missing a subtle policy issue here?  (It makes cases like

IDE has been recently fixed, patches are at

Just FYI to not waste time on it. :-)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-08-01 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-01  8:37 Messing with Kconfig Rob Landley
2003-08-01  9:33 ` Roman Zippel
2003-08-01 13:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2003-08-01  9:01 John Bradford
2003-08-01  9:12 ` Rob Landley
2003-08-01 15:27 ` Nicolas Pitre
2003-08-01 17:12   ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).