From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263007AbTKERaI (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:30:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263009AbTKERaI (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:30:08 -0500 Received: from mion.elka.pw.edu.pl ([194.29.160.35]:49352 "EHLO mion.elka.pw.edu.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263007AbTKERaF (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:30:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 18:29:07 +0100 (MET) From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Flavio Bruno Leitner cc: Subject: Re: IDE disk information changed from 2.4 to 2.6 In-Reply-To: <20031105172310.GE5304@conectiva.com.br> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Flavio Bruno Leitner wrote: > Upgrading from kernel 2.4 to 2.6 the CHS information for the same hardware What are the exact kernel versions? > changed. This behaviour is correct? I am just investigating it. > Using 2.4: > hda: 12594960 sectors (6449 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=784/255/63, UDMA (33) > > Using 2.6: > hda: 12594960 sectors (6449 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=13328/15/63, UDMA (33) > > regards, > > -- > Flávio Bruno Leitner > [ E74B 0BD0 5E05 C385 239E 531C BC17 D670 7FF0 A9E0 ]