From: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
"Alexandru Ardelean" <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] iio: buffer-dma: write() and new DMABUF based API
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 10:11:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <QI1I9R.GDPWLM86I45S@crapouillou.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YkLEXJzs8ukrxG8s@phenom.ffwll.local>
Hi Daniel,
Le mar., mars 29 2022 at 10:33:32 +0200, Daniel Vetter
<daniel@ffwll.ch> a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 05:43:35PM +0000, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>> Le dim., févr. 13 2022 at 18:46:16 +0000, Jonathan Cameron
>> <jic23@kernel.org> a écrit :
>> > On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 12:59:21 +0000
>> > Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Jonathan,
>> > >
>> > > This is the V2 of my patchset that introduces a new userspace
>> > > interface
>> > > based on DMABUF objects to complement the fileio API, and adds
>> > > write()
>> > > support to the existing fileio API.
>> >
>> > Hi Paul,
>> >
>> > It's been a little while. Perhaps you could summarize the various
>> view
>> > points around the appropriateness of using DMABUF for this?
>> > I appreciate it is a tricky topic to distil into a brief summary
>> but
>> > I know I would find it useful even if no one else does!
>>
>> So we want to have a high-speed interface where buffers of samples
>> are
>> passed around between IIO devices and other devices (e.g. USB or
>> network),
>> or made available to userspace without copying the data.
>>
>> DMABUF is, at least in theory, exactly what we need. Quoting the
>> documentation
>> (https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.15/driver-api/dma-buf.html):
>> "The dma-buf subsystem provides the framework for sharing buffers
>> for
>> hardware (DMA) access across multiple device drivers and
>> subsystems, and for
>> synchronizing asynchronous hardware access. This is used, for
>> example, by
>> drm “prime” multi-GPU support, but is of course not limited to
>> GPU use
>> cases."
>>
>> The problem is that right now DMABUF is only really used by DRM,
>> and to
>> quote Daniel, "dma-buf looks like something super generic and
>> useful, until
>> you realize that there's a metric ton of gpu/accelerator bagage
>> piled in".
>>
>> Still, it seems to be the only viable option. We could add a custom
>> buffer-passing interface, but that would mean implementing the same
>> buffer-passing interface on the network and USB stacks, and before
>> we know
>> it we re-invented DMABUFs.
>
> dma-buf also doesn't support sharing with network and usb stacks, so
> I'm a
> bit confused why exactly this is useful?
There is an attempt to get dma-buf support in the network stack, called
"zctap". Last patchset was sent last november. USB stack does not
support dma-buf, but we can add it later I guess.
> So yeah unless there's some sharing going on with gpu stuff (for data
> processing maybe) I'm not sure this makes a lot of sense really. Or at
> least some zero-copy sharing between drivers, but even that would
> minimally require a dma-buf import ioctl of some sorts. Which I either
> missed or doesn't exist.
We do want zero-copy between drivers, the network stack, and the USB
stack. It's not just about having a userspace interface.
> If there's none of that then just hand-roll your buffer handling code
> (xarray is cheap to use in terms of code for this), you can always add
> dma-buf import/export later on when the need arises.
>
> Scrolling through patches you only have dma-buf export, but no
> importing,
> so the use-case that works is with one of the existing subsystems that
> supporting dma-buf importing.
>
> I think minimally we need the use-case (in form of code) that needs
> the
> buffer sharing here.
I'll try with zctap and report back.
Cheers,
-Paul
>> > >
>> > > Changes since v1:
>> > >
>> > > - the patches that were merged in v1 have been (obviously)
>> dropped
>> > > from
>> > > this patchset;
>> > > - the patch that was setting the write-combine cache setting
>> has
>> > > been
>> > > dropped as well, as it was simply not useful.
>> > > - [01/12]:
>> > > * Only remove the outgoing queue, and keep the incoming
>> queue,
>> > > as we
>> > > want the buffer to start streaming data as soon as it is
>> > > enabled.
>> > > * Remove IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DEQUEUED, since it is now
>> functionally
>> > > the
>> > > same as IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DONE.
>> > > - [02/12]:
>> > > * Fix block->state not being reset in
>> > > iio_dma_buffer_request_update() for output buffers.
>> > > * Only update block->bytes_used once and add a comment
>> about
>> > > why we
>> > > update it.
>> > > * Add a comment about why we're setting a different state
>> for
>> > > output
>> > > buffers in iio_dma_buffer_request_update()
>> > > * Remove useless cast to bool (!!) in iio_dma_buffer_io()
>> > > - [05/12]:
>> > > Only allow the new IOCTLs on the buffer FD created with
>> > > IIO_BUFFER_GET_FD_IOCTL().
>> > > - [12/12]:
>> > > * Explicitly state that the new interface is optional and
>> is
>> > > not implemented by all drivers.
>> > > * The IOCTLs can now only be called on the buffer FD
>> returned by
>> > > IIO_BUFFER_GET_FD_IOCTL.
>> > > * Move the page up a bit in the index since it is core
>> stuff
>> > > and not
>> > > driver-specific.
>> > >
>> > > The patches not listed here have not been modified since v1.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > -Paul
>> > >
>> > > Alexandru Ardelean (1):
>> > > iio: buffer-dma: split iio_dma_buffer_fileio_free() function
>> > >
>> > > Paul Cercueil (11):
>> > > iio: buffer-dma: Get rid of outgoing queue
>> > > iio: buffer-dma: Enable buffer write support
>> > > iio: buffer-dmaengine: Support specifying buffer direction
>> > > iio: buffer-dmaengine: Enable write support
>> > > iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure
>> > > iio: buffer-dma: Use DMABUFs instead of custom solution
>> > > iio: buffer-dma: Implement new DMABUF based userspace API
>> > > iio: buffer-dmaengine: Support new DMABUF based userspace API
>> > > iio: core: Add support for cyclic buffers
>> > > iio: buffer-dmaengine: Add support for cyclic buffers
>> > > Documentation: iio: Document high-speed DMABUF based API
>> > >
>> > > Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst | 2 +
>> > > Documentation/iio/dmabuf_api.rst | 94 +++
>> > > Documentation/iio/index.rst | 2 +
>> > > drivers/iio/adc/adi-axi-adc.c | 3 +-
>> > > drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c | 610
>> > > ++++++++++++++----
>> > > .../buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c | 42 +-
>> > > drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 60 ++
>> > > include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h | 38 +-
>> > > include/linux/iio/buffer-dmaengine.h | 5 +-
>> > > include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h | 8 +
>> > > include/uapi/linux/iio/buffer.h | 30 +
>> > > 11 files changed, 749 insertions(+), 145 deletions(-)
>> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/iio/dmabuf_api.rst
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-29 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-07 12:59 [PATCH v2 00/12] iio: buffer-dma: write() and new DMABUF based API Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] iio: buffer-dma: Get rid of outgoing queue Paul Cercueil
2022-02-13 18:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-13 19:25 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-28 17:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] iio: buffer-dma: Enable buffer write support Paul Cercueil
2022-03-28 17:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-28 18:39 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-29 7:11 ` Nuno Sá
2022-03-28 20:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Support specifying buffer direction Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Enable write support Paul Cercueil
2022-03-28 17:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure Paul Cercueil
2022-03-28 17:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-28 18:44 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-29 13:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-28 20:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] iio: buffer-dma: split iio_dma_buffer_fileio_free() function Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] iio: buffer-dma: Use DMABUFs instead of custom solution Paul Cercueil
2022-03-28 17:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-28 17:54 ` Christian König
2022-03-28 19:16 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-28 20:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] iio: buffer-dma: Implement new DMABUF based userspace API Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Support " Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 12:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] iio: core: Add support for cyclic buffers Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] iio: buffer-dmaengine: " Paul Cercueil
2022-02-07 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] Documentation: iio: Document high-speed DMABUF based API Paul Cercueil
2022-03-29 8:54 ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-29 9:47 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-29 14:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-29 17:34 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-30 9:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2022-02-13 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] iio: buffer-dma: write() and new " Jonathan Cameron
2022-02-15 17:43 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-29 8:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-29 9:11 ` Paul Cercueil [this message]
2022-03-29 14:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2022-03-29 17:16 ` Paul Cercueil
2022-03-30 9:19 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=QI1I9R.GDPWLM86I45S@crapouillou.net \
--to=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=ardeleanalex@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).