* include/linux/version.h
@ 2003-12-02 18:35 Stefan J. Betz
2003-12-02 19:12 ` include/linux/version.h Gene Heskett
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan J. Betz @ 2003-12-02 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello People,
i have found some wrong thing in include/linux/version.h
On my System i have Kernel 2.6.0-test10 & 2.6.0-test11, but in
include/linux/version.h i see:
#define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test9"
correct where:
#definde UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test11" (for Linux Kernel 2.6.0-test11)...
Here is a little "patch":
diff -Nru linux-2.6.0-test11/include/linux/version.h linux-2.6.0-test11-fixed/include/linux/version.h
--- linux-2.6.0-test11/include/linux/version.h Tue Dec 2 19:21:22 2003
+++ linux-2.6.0-test11-fixed/include/linux/version.h Tue Dec 2 19:22:06 2003
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-#define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test9"
+#define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test11"
#define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 132608
#define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + (c))
I know that this is not a very usefull fix, but i think 2.6.0 should be
BugFree (TM) :-)
Greeting Betz Stefan
I know that my english is not realy good, but any tipp how i can learn
better english is welcome...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: include/linux/version.h
2003-12-02 18:35 include/linux/version.h Stefan J. Betz
@ 2003-12-02 19:12 ` Gene Heskett
2003-12-02 19:48 ` include/linux/version.h Diego Calleja García
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gene Heskett @ 2003-12-02 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan J. Betz, linux-kernel
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 13:35, Stefan J. Betz wrote:
>Hello People,
>
>i have found some wrong thing in include/linux/version.h
>On my System i have Kernel 2.6.0-test10 & 2.6.0-test11, but in
>include/linux/version.h i see:
>#define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test9"
>
>correct where:
>#definde UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test11" (for Linux Kernel
> 2.6.0-test11)...
>
>Here is a little "patch":
>
>diff -Nru linux-2.6.0-test11/include/linux/version.h
> linux-2.6.0-test11-fixed/include/linux/version.h ---
> linux-2.6.0-test11/include/linux/version.h Tue Dec 2 19:21:22 2003
> +++ linux-2.6.0-test11-fixed/include/linux/version.h Tue Dec 2
> 19:22:06 2003 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
>-#define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test9"
>+#define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test11"
> #define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 132608
> #define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + (c))
>
>I know that this is not a very usefull fix, but i think 2.6.0 should
> be BugFree (TM) :-)
>
>Greeting Betz Stefan
Humm, where did you get your srcs from? include/linux/version.h reads
2.6.0-test11 here...
>
>I know that my english is not realy good, but any tipp how i can
> learn better english is welcome...
An occasional miss-spelled word (tipp is really spelled tip) doesn't
break our comprehension, do carry on.
--
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz 512M
99.27% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: include/linux/version.h
2003-12-02 18:35 include/linux/version.h Stefan J. Betz
2003-12-02 19:12 ` include/linux/version.h Gene Heskett
@ 2003-12-02 19:48 ` Diego Calleja García
2003-12-02 20:00 ` include/linux/version.h Michael Buesch
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312021447160.896@morpheus>
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Diego Calleja García @ 2003-12-02 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan J. Betz; +Cc: linux-kernel
El Tue, 2 Dec 2003 19:35:22 +0100 "Stefan J. Betz" <stefan_betz@gmx.net> escribió:
> Hello People,
>
> i have found some wrong thing in include/linux/version.h
include/linux/version.h isn't provided in the kernel tarball. It is
created when you build something. Ej: do a "make distclean", then:
diego@estel:~/kernel/unsta$ cat include/linux/version.h
cat: include/linux/version.h: No such file or directory
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: include/linux/version.h
2003-12-02 18:35 include/linux/version.h Stefan J. Betz
2003-12-02 19:12 ` include/linux/version.h Gene Heskett
2003-12-02 19:48 ` include/linux/version.h Diego Calleja García
@ 2003-12-02 20:00 ` Michael Buesch
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312021447160.896@morpheus>
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Buesch @ 2003-12-02 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan J. Betz; +Cc: linux kernel mailing list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 19:35, Stefan J. Betz wrote:
> Hello People,
Hi Stefan,
> i have found some wrong thing in include/linux/version.h
> On my System i have Kernel 2.6.0-test10 & 2.6.0-test11, but in
> include/linux/version.h i see:
> #define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test9"
>
> correct where:
> #definde UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test11" (for Linux Kernel 2.6.0-test11)...
Hm, I think that file is automatically generated at compile-time,
isn't it?
Are you sure, you grepped through the correct tree? Or is this
an old one, that was sitting in some dusty corner on your disk?
> Greeting Betz Stefan
>
> I know that my english is not realy good, but any tipp how i can learn
> better english is welcome...
Don't read my mails, because they are ugly english, too. 8-)
- --
Regards Michael Buesch [ http://www.tuxsoft.de.vu ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/zO9NoxoigfggmSgRAhLMAJ43jo4/Pw7em+LbHRMUB4rgn/79EACfb8xa
fAFiprdxGFZE+aBLRePHS5s=
=6MLE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: include/linux/version.h
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312021447160.896@morpheus>
@ 2003-12-02 20:38 ` Stefan J. Betz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan J. Betz @ 2003-12-02 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: burton windle; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 665 bytes --]
Am Tue, Dec 02, 2003 um 20:47:44 CET, burton windle schrieb:
> I believe include/linux/version.h gets dynamically generated.
>
> What does the Makefile say for the version? Everything gets its numbers
> from the Makefile.
Oh... Ups...
Why i have never readed that a simple "make distclean" does make such
things :-(
I have now maked a "make distclean", and now all is correct...
Sorry for consuming our time...
Thanks for all...
--
Das Telefonnetz... Unendliche Weiten... Dies sind die Abenteuer eines
genervten Internet-Surfers... Weit von zu Hause entfernt stößt er in
Bereiche des Systems vor, die vorher noch niemand gesehen hat...
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 248 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-02 20:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-02 18:35 include/linux/version.h Stefan J. Betz
2003-12-02 19:12 ` include/linux/version.h Gene Heskett
2003-12-02 19:48 ` include/linux/version.h Diego Calleja García
2003-12-02 20:00 ` include/linux/version.h Michael Buesch
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312021447160.896@morpheus>
2003-12-02 20:38 ` include/linux/version.h Stefan J. Betz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).