From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270208AbTGMKYO (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2003 06:24:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270209AbTGMKYO (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2003 06:24:14 -0400 Received: from nice-1-a7-62-147-124-80.dial.proxad.net ([62.147.124.80]:31495 "EHLO monpc") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270208AbTGMKYL (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2003 06:24:11 -0400 From: Guillaume Chazarain To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 12:41:41 +0200 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-Id: Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] SCHED_ISO for interactivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" X-Mailer: Opera 6.06 build 1145 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Con, I am currently testing SCHED_ISO, but I have noticed a regression: I do a make -j5 in linux-2.5.75/ everything is OK since gcc prio is 25. X and fvwm prio are 15, but when I move a window it's very jerky. And btw, as I am interested in scheduler improvements, do you have a testcase where the stock scheduler does the bad thing? Preferably without KDE nor Mozilla (I don't have them installed, and I'll have access to a decent connection in september). BTW2, you all seem to test interactivity with xmms. Just for those like me that didn't noticed, I have just found that it skips much less with alsa's OSS emulation than with alsa-xmms. Thanks, Guillaume