archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David griego" <>
Subject: Re: Alan Shih: "TCP IP Offloading Interface"
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:14:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)

How does one measure the reliability and security of current software TCP/IP 
stacks?  Some standard set of test would have to be identified and the TOEs 
would need to be tested against this to ensure that they meet some minimum 
standard.  I would suggest offloading the minimum amount from the OS so that 
most of the control could be maintaind by the OS stack.  This also would 
make failover/routing changes between TOE -TOE, and TOE-NIC easier.  Current 
offloads such as checksum and segmentation will not be enough for 10GbE 
processing, so it would have to be something more than we have today.

>From: Jeff Garzik <>
>To: David griego <>
>Subject: Re: Alan Shih: "TCP IP Offloading Interface"
>Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:02:35 -0400
>David griego wrote:
>>IMHO, there are several cases for some type of TCP/IP offload.  One is for 
>>embedded systems that are just not capable of doing 1Gbps+.  Another is 
>>with 10GbE, even high end servers will not be able keep up with TCP 
>>processing/data movement at these speeds.  Not being proactive in adopting 
>>TCP/IP offload will force Linux into accepting some scheme that will not 
>>necissarily be best.
>How does one evaluate a TOE stack to be sure that all the security fixes in 
>Linux are also in that stack?
>How does one evaluate a TOE stack to be sure it doesn't add new security 
>holes that Linux never had?
>	Jeff

MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.

             reply	other threads:[~2003-07-14 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-14 19:14 David griego [this message]
2003-07-14 19:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-15 12:42   ` Jesse Pollard
2003-07-14 19:46 ` Alan Cox
     [not found] <>
2003-07-15 11:18 ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-14 21:51 David griego
2003-07-14 20:29 David griego
2003-07-14 20:23 David griego
2003-07-14 20:19 David griego
2003-07-14 20:31 ` Alan Shih
2003-07-14 20:34 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-14 21:53   ` Deepak Saxena
2003-07-17 22:31     ` Bill Davidsen
2003-07-14 19:43 David griego
2003-07-14 20:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-14 20:23   ` Alan Cox
2003-07-14 20:05 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-14 20:30   ` Shawn
2003-07-15  5:58   ` Werner Almesberger
2003-07-14 18:46 David griego
2003-07-14 19:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-14 21:22   ` Deepak Saxena
2003-07-14 21:45     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-15  5:27     ` Werner Almesberger
2003-07-14 19:42 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: Alan Shih: "TCP IP Offloading Interface"' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).