From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262960AbTC1LfU>; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 06:35:20 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262962AbTC1LfU>; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 06:35:20 -0500
Received: from hera.cwi.nl ([192.16.191.8]:56995 "EHLO hera.cwi.nl")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S262960AbTC1LfT>;
	Fri, 28 Mar 2003 06:35:19 -0500
From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 12:46:33 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <UTC200303281146.h2SBkXN06256.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl>
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, zippel@linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> the actual size of this number is only a small detail

Yes. It is that detail I am concerned with.