* [PATCH] small dev_t fix
@ 2003-09-28 11:51 Andries.Brouwer
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andries.Brouwer @ 2003-09-28 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: torvalds; +Cc: linux-kernel
See that we finally got a larger dev_t. Very good!
Will check over time what form my patches got in the current tree.
The first one I checked was broken a little. Below a fix.
[ext2 used a 32-bit field for dev_t, with possibly undefined
storage following; thus, no action was required to go to
32-bit dev_t, but going to 64-bit dev_t required some subtlety:
0 was written in the first word and the 64 bits in the following two.
Al truncated my 64-bit stuff to 32 bits but did not understand why
there was this split, and wrote 0 followed by a single word.
We should at least zero the word following to have well-defined
This is for fs/ext2/inode.c.
--- inode.c~ Sun Sep 28 12:42:15 2003
+++ inode.c Sun Sep 28 13:25:03 2003
@@ -1228,6 +1228,7 @@
raw_inode->i_block = 0;
+ raw_inode->i_block = 0;
} else for (n = 0; n < EXT2_N_BLOCKS; n++)
raw_inode->i_block[n] = ei->i_data[n];
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-09-28 11:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-28 11:51 [PATCH] small dev_t fix Andries.Brouwer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).