From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262772AbTJZK1I (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Oct 2003 05:27:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262798AbTJZK1I (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Oct 2003 05:27:08 -0500 Received: from hera.cwi.nl ([192.16.191.8]:22170 "EHLO hera.cwi.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262772AbTJZK1E (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Oct 2003 05:27:04 -0500 From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 11:26:49 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.0-test9 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: OGAWA Hirofumi Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl writes: > Within a few days two people have reported that they cannot > mount a FAT fs that 2.4 and Windows handle fine. > Probably also that should be fixed, for example with > my patch from yesterday. Was the other report by private email? Yes. Mark McPherson wrote: I have an Archos Jukebox Recorder 20 which has never been re-formatted since I purchased it. It fails to mount under 2.6 with the same report as the flash card, and also mounts successfully under 2.4. Patching around the code as you suggested allows it to mount without complaint under 2.6. Win2K thinks this file system is just fine. Andries