linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
	Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@arm.com>,
	Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] kasan: clarify HW_TAGS impact on TBI
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:38:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/2KJb5SN5DUq1C+@elver.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5dfc703ddd7eacda0ee0da083c7afad44afff8c.1609871239.git.andreyknvl@google.com>

On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:27PM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Mention in the documentation that enabling CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS
> always results in in-kernel TBI (Top Byte Ignore) being enabled.
> 
> Also do a few minor documentation cleanups.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
> Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/Iba2a6697e3c6304cb53f89ec61dedc77fa29e3ae

Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>

> ---
>  Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 16 +++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
> index 0fc3fb1860c4..26c99852a852 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
> @@ -147,15 +147,14 @@ negative values to distinguish between different kinds of inaccessible memory
>  like redzones or freed memory (see mm/kasan/kasan.h).
>  
>  In the report above the arrows point to the shadow byte 03, which means that
> -the accessed address is partially accessible.
> -
> -For tag-based KASAN this last report section shows the memory tags around the
> -accessed address (see `Implementation details`_ section).
> +the accessed address is partially accessible. For tag-based KASAN modes this
> +last report section shows the memory tags around the accessed address
> +(see the `Implementation details`_ section).
>  
>  Boot parameters
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  
> -Hardware tag-based KASAN mode (see the section about different mode below) is
> +Hardware tag-based KASAN mode (see the section about various modes below) is
>  intended for use in production as a security mitigation. Therefore it supports
>  boot parameters that allow to disable KASAN competely or otherwise control
>  particular KASAN features.
> @@ -305,6 +304,13 @@ reserved to tag freed memory regions.
>  Hardware tag-based KASAN currently only supports tagging of
>  kmem_cache_alloc/kmalloc and page_alloc memory.
>  
> +If the hardware doesn't support MTE (pre ARMv8.5), hardware tag-based KASAN
> +won't be enabled. In this case all boot parameters are ignored.
> +
> +Note, that enabling CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS always results in in-kernel TBI being
> +enabled. Even when kasan.mode=off is provided, or when the hardware doesn't
> +support MTE (but supports TBI).
> +
>  What memory accesses are sanitised by KASAN?
>  --------------------------------------------
>  
> -- 
> 2.29.2.729.g45daf8777d-goog
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-12 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-05 18:27 [PATCH 00/11] kasan: HW_TAGS tests support and fixes Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 01/11] kasan: prefix exported functions with kasan_ Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12  7:38   ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-01-12 11:19   ` Marco Elver
2021-01-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 02/11] kasan: clarify HW_TAGS impact on TBI Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12  7:40   ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-01-12 11:38   ` Marco Elver [this message]
2021-01-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 03/11] kasan: clean up comments in tests Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12  7:53   ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-01-12 17:55     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12 13:07   ` Marco Elver
2021-01-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 04/11] kasan: add match-all tag tests Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12  8:04   ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-01-12 18:10     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12 13:17   ` Marco Elver
2021-01-12 18:11     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 05/11] kasan, arm64: allow using KUnit tests with HW_TAGS mode Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12 19:01   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-15 13:11     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-15 15:04   ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 06/11] kasan: rename CONFIG_TEST_KASAN_MODULE Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12  8:09   ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-01-12 18:26     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12 13:33   ` Marco Elver
2021-01-12 18:28     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 07/11] kasan: add compiler barriers to KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12  8:18   ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-01-12 19:50     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12 19:57       ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12 13:34   ` Marco Elver
2021-01-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 08/11] kasan: adopt kmalloc_uaf2 test to HW_TAGS mode Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12  8:25   ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-01-12 20:04     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12 13:39   ` Marco Elver
2021-01-12 20:05     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 09/11] kasan: fix memory corruption in kasan_bitops_tags test Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12  8:30   ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-01-12 20:06     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-13 12:30       ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-01-12 13:55   ` Marco Elver
2021-01-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 10/11] kasan: fix bug detection via ksize for HW_TAGS mode Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12 14:32   ` Marco Elver
2021-01-12 21:16     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12 22:54       ` Marco Elver
2021-01-05 18:27 ` [PATCH 11/11] kasan: add proper page allocator tests Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-12  8:57   ` Alexander Potapenko
2021-01-12 14:34   ` Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=X/2KJb5SN5DUq1C+@elver.google.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=Branislav.Rankov@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=eugenis@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).