From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE0BC433DB for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824072222D for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726743AbhAJPxu (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:53:50 -0500 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([213.167.242.64]:36128 "EHLO perceval.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726263AbhAJPxt (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 10:53:49 -0500 Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (62-78-145-57.bb.dnainternet.fi [62.78.145.57]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1BB2DA; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 16:53:06 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1610293986; bh=mdp/42K9ju2NRuvkRPWyCbi9pUrRQdaXR83ukN6BuR4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RMfhimpuuC7SP/wI7LlPTD3bHKeXEmS/cbmxHGPjZ2rAxeSMC+O4MIykKQlGnvoMU JTQUO005IfZxaEQ5jJR7xcvCJqFdgWEkX0SNOb+huNeu4OXsbit3or9Smd2I5qFwWT kfW8ZFdH5VyHZPARmUtGIXp/FXQJd6w6pkUenk40= Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 17:52:52 +0200 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Sergey Senozhatsky , Daniel Scally , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-media@vger.kernel.org" , "devel@acpica.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "lenb@kernel.org" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "yong.zhi@intel.com" , "sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com" , "bingbu.cao@intel.com" , "tian.shu.qiu@intel.com" , "robert.moore@intel.com" , "erik.kaneda@intel.com" , "andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" , "linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk" , "laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com" , "jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org" , "kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com" , "hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl" , "m.felsch@pengutronix.de" , "niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se" , "prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com" , "slongerbeam@gmail.com" , "heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/15] lib/test_printf.c: Use helper function to unwind array of software_nodes Message-ID: References: <20210107132838.396641-1-djrscally@gmail.com> <20210107132838.396641-10-djrscally@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 05:38:03PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 1:16 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 11:07:33AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 9, 2021, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > Could you please let us know if you're fine with this patch getting > > > > merged in v5.12 through the linux-media tree ? The cover letter contains > > > > additional details (in a nutshell, this is a cross-tree series and we > > > > would like to avoid topic branches if possible). > > > > > > There is already a tag by Petr. > > > > I saw that, but looking at the corresponding e-mail, there was no clear > > acknowledgement that we could merge this patch through a different tree. > > Fair point. > > One question though, what so wrong with topic branches. They're not wrong, they just add more complexity as all maintainers involved would need to create a topic branch based on v5.11-rc1 and merge it in their respective tree. It's certainly doable, but when there's no risk of conflict, merging the whole series through a single tree is just easier. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart