From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C89FC83013 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 09:21:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8D820C56 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 09:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730053AbgLCJVY (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 04:21:24 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f195.google.com ([209.85.208.195]:40105 "EHLO mail-lj1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726003AbgLCJVX (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 04:21:23 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f195.google.com with SMTP id y10so1741185ljc.7; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 01:21:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Haixfnk0EClHPuSrxRGUPorYEv9GlFW9Rbqw9Fo43CM=; b=l6XCu63IusFuyiWNOj4OWkOpLLJPy3/k85AURZOSWq4pK+oZP4UEwbbz9Nh1vMwGxn f6cwUcqwQG0wJePjvq0PPkYylagQqEupic9N6iwM21JfB4tkMgnSqaYNAZAh+nO0RjhF H/grx2odk+X3jswIYZT4duwzB0njPXdjorDn5F+t4iW/zCAafViRxiYpjJK9ZDrccm7O GXfO5kh8/57DYKrSU+AczW7WSExkjWsY2IXVrsFmw7I1MeuON4KU1oZXzkPan/VfwZEX hVDe1beP8hIeI9VffuixW9lBo6RnVBcpMzPsNynQ07aSdELA7HAxh3xBlj5/Ttpxc0D8 bJIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532aIymhoNpuMXTa1hzY33JNbmrynK9czgLwdp0k+Er0To7WCxKf rBXcuL7BMwUsgZ3LHvIlJf8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXwFCBA1+gnIb4rvykgEvMcC8IDEn2NNk7T2dMVFASY6oJFDyLHVeUpNlCtlmo6gtu6SncLw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:228:: with SMTP id z8mr831527ljn.216.1606987241706; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 01:20:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from xi.terra (c-beaee455.07-184-6d6c6d4.bbcust.telenor.se. [85.228.174.190]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 136sm296673lfn.193.2020.12.03.01.20.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 03 Dec 2020 01:20:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from johan by xi.terra with local (Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from ) id 1kkknZ-0003Nr-S4; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 10:21:14 +0100 Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 10:21:13 +0100 From: Johan Hovold To: Mychaela Falconia Cc: Johan Hovold , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , "Mychaela N . Falconia" , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] tty: add flag to suppress ready signalling on open Message-ID: References: <20201202113942.27024-1-johan@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:07:58AM -0800, Mychaela Falconia wrote: > On 12/2/20, Johan Hovold wrote: > > Also let me know if you prefer to hold this off for 5.12. The change is > > minimal, self-contained and low-risk, but it is a new interface and late > > in the release cycle as Andy pointed out. > > Hold off for 5.12? Did you perhaps mean 5.11? I understand how this > change may be too late for 5.10, but surely it can go into 5.11 merge > window, why hold off for 5.12? No, I meant 5.12, even if I still think this could go into 5.11. Generally new features should brew a bit in linux-next. It's mostly bots testing linux-next, and they wouldn't be able to catch anything beyond potential build issues as this feature is off by default anyway. So I don't think that needs to be an issue in this case. But we don't have deadlines and if, say, for one reason or another Greg doesn't have time to review this in the next couple of weeks, we'll just hold it off. Johan