From: Greg KH <email@example.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <email@example.com>,
Linus Torvalds <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.10
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:44:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X9eWf0eGHonxQk5H@kroah.com> (raw)
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:02:47AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14 2020 at 12:52am -0500,
> Greg KH <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:31:47AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 03:03:29PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > Ok, here it is - 5.10 is tagged and pushed out.
> > > >
> > > > I pretty much always wish that the last week was even calmer than it
> > > > was, and that's true here too. There's a fair amount of fixes in here,
> > > > including a few last-minute reverts for things that didn't get fixed,
> > > > but nothing makes me go "we need another week".
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > Mike Snitzer (1):
> > > > md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned
> > >
> > > Seems to be broken. This breaks mounting my raid6 partition:
> > >
> > > [ 87.290698] attempt to access beyond end of device
> > > md0: rw=4096, want=13996467328, limit=6261202944
> > > [ 87.293371] attempt to access beyond end of device
> > > md0: rw=4096, want=13998564480, limit=6261202944
> > > [ 87.296045] BTRFS warning (device md0): couldn't read tree root
> > > [ 87.300056] BTRFS error (device md0): open_ctree failed
> > >
> > > Reverting it goes back to the -rc7 behaviour where it mounts fine.
> > If the developer/maintainer(s) agree, I can revert this and push out a
> > 5.10.1, just let me know.
> Yes, these should be reverted from 5.10 via 5.10.1:
> e0910c8e4f87 dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10
> f075cfb1dc59 md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned
> They were also both marked for stable@, and I just got email stating
> that you've staged them both for 5.4 and 5.9, but they shouldn't go to
> stable@. We need to reassess and fix during 5.11.
Ok, will go push out a 5.10.1 with those reverted, but please, get the
reverts into Linus as soon as possible as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-14 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-13 23:03 Linux 5.10 Linus Torvalds
2020-12-14 5:31 ` Dave Jones
2020-12-14 5:40 ` Dave Jones
2020-12-14 5:52 ` Greg KH
2020-12-14 16:02 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-12-14 16:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-12-14 17:21 ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-14 17:29 ` Dave Jones
2020-12-14 16:44 ` Greg KH [this message]
2020-12-14 17:06 ` Mike Snitzer
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).