From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5FCC2BB9A for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 16:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F2622286 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 16:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2501945AbgLNQo3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:44:29 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45390 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727753AbgLNQoY (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 11:44:24 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:44:47 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1607964224; bh=Pk+XCiHHVxje/Yvvinw5lMgWaIoh+grgFYLPBUgmLS8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ys6xF+UdmqbY9sKd5jlITCx41WKhmsDGfwo1u2ZAqdjvxz2+vK06lBw6JDKYv8dID pCa73Zpns+fMvckLlyF3zkMgxtkuf5aNm2sVds/sbHWSe1JsRp/99k6Lvr+yyuHcss 6udE7lxFPn+zAN1VZR7mSNdTxTkz4eeGSZU/Bof4= From: Greg KH To: Mike Snitzer Cc: Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 5.10 Message-ID: References: <20201214053147.GA24093@codemonkey.org.uk> <20201214160247.GA2090@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201214160247.GA2090@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:02:47AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14 2020 at 12:52am -0500, > Greg KH wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:31:47AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 03:03:29PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Ok, here it is - 5.10 is tagged and pushed out. > > > > > > > > I pretty much always wish that the last week was even calmer than it > > > > was, and that's true here too. There's a fair amount of fixes in here, > > > > including a few last-minute reverts for things that didn't get fixed, > > > > but nothing makes me go "we need another week". > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > Mike Snitzer (1): > > > > md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned > > > > > > Seems to be broken. This breaks mounting my raid6 partition: > > > > > > [ 87.290698] attempt to access beyond end of device > > > md0: rw=4096, want=13996467328, limit=6261202944 > > > [ 87.293371] attempt to access beyond end of device > > > md0: rw=4096, want=13998564480, limit=6261202944 > > > [ 87.296045] BTRFS warning (device md0): couldn't read tree root > > > [ 87.300056] BTRFS error (device md0): open_ctree failed > > > > > > Reverting it goes back to the -rc7 behaviour where it mounts fine. > > > > If the developer/maintainer(s) agree, I can revert this and push out a > > 5.10.1, just let me know. > > Yes, these should be reverted from 5.10 via 5.10.1: > > e0910c8e4f87 dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10 > f075cfb1dc59 md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned > > They were also both marked for stable@, and I just got email stating > that you've staged them both for 5.4 and 5.9, but they shouldn't go to > stable@. We need to reassess and fix during 5.11. Ok, will go push out a 5.10.1 with those reverted, but please, get the reverts into Linus as soon as possible as well. thanks, greg k-h