From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261347AbVARQuP (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:50:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261350AbVARQuP (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:50:15 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:13535 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261347AbVARQuG (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:50:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:49:51 -0500 (EST) From: James Morris X-X-Sender: jmorris@thoron.boston.redhat.com To: Fruhwirth Clemens cc: Michal Ludvig , Andrew Morton , , "David S. Miller" , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] CryptoAPI: prepare for processing multiple buffers at a time In-Reply-To: <1105793137.16065.17.camel@ghanima> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote: > However, developing two different APIs isn't particular efficient. I > know, at the moment there isn't much choice, as J.Morris hasn't commited > to acrypto in anyway. There is also the OCF port (OpenBSD crypto framework) to consider, if permission to dual license from the original authors can be obtained. - James -- James Morris