From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECBEC433FE for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 12:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229799AbiJNMPR (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 08:15:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55364 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229609AbiJNMPI (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 08:15:08 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 181FF4AD6E; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 05:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id f11so7254526wrm.6; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 05:15:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SMvaGsw3aJfVXTn2+0JJBsQsLQ3oGxiGRqYprDO+ECU=; b=LofS5n5C1coAeYTHoG4vAOM9mLxnIvZkWn+eUmgb1QzV9uuKWVcpFMDESH8a/y5rBJ BZzI8IDS2o06QoMsVVDPp3q8kZHmkjZS8XIh8BjhA7xUUYPFpQF2h4KNWm/mbAjQmk/a LnGrDdGgeiS5cLIOkpztxlpV/MwpB+QCBFsszuQqjUKIDW5v4TSmfjaISu8objlc92iY nOwqH673R0mqPq8p9FT1XIeN4eONDMFKmyjngtCjr6HKrFOHl7OU8XPMUAjdvSuuR0Mk kJEPKQjkPVMAeZJzqeHTv+Hk69nbufem78QGkeJVXBzHESp/zBe0EeWWQOTY473Al2OV 8adg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=SMvaGsw3aJfVXTn2+0JJBsQsLQ3oGxiGRqYprDO+ECU=; b=QVQetX6jaJOG1/lENEDq5RU4kyDm4J9I5o8Pz1kKv/wWd6NW6Q9NCo5YJL9wXbJCQx /xywmxau/8qQCkXkXyEJG/lM3XUElkEANerwFMf9ZxXK7lwAqctMNytdRTPQzAploGFC 9ddSVFBXvkI4OisL/y5+vReEue5H28z619mIWK1DtOD0yYd4nfLIXuFZRcGW6Mp3Gwcc fLPP44tP678Lfo2wMQlsxxS+S79mztD47lm7wmDOtSaD4selysKSuf65A89+nwpmdXN0 GARrPwci4d8uYexPyXeR1VzHxXcQ9DR7t5jYWhwO0jxVunLyCTORj2gf1kqSowdcvxcd J7SQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf37bMot8i9wl5BnCoZ8jEwTYbCguy0O6r2Jb2dkZxZSjBUR3TPB 3g0SqtsOH5vr1jqChSmY4dI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4/6LN2iF5+9XTo9sukWG5rfutBYm/rj0G0Gpa1ZZX6cywOpoxMcgeZJz5+h9pqBwrWhY+yXw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:108a:b0:22e:5610:7987 with SMTP id y10-20020a056000108a00b0022e56107987mr3000355wrw.527.1665749705354; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 05:15:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h5-20020adfe985000000b002322bff5b3bsm2235891wrm.54.2022.10.14.05.15.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 05:15:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:15:03 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.0 00/34] 6.0.2-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20221013175146.507746257@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221013175146.507746257@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 07:52:38PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.0.2 release. > There are 34 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Oct 2022 17:51:33 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220925): mips: 52 configs -> no failure arm: 100 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2001 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1997 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2000 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip