Re: [RFC v4 net-next 12/17] mfd: ocelot: add shared resource names for switch functionality

From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 net-next 12/17] mfd: ocelot: add shared resource names for switch functionality
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 09:35:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1+Wxaub15XveooC@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221008185152.2411007-13-colin.foster@in-advantage.com>

On Sat, 08 Oct 2022, Colin Foster wrote:

> The switch portion of the Ocelot chip relies on several resources. Define
> the resource names here, so they can be referenced by both the switch
> driver and the MFD.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
> ---
> 
> v4
>     * New patch. Previous versions had entire structures shared,
>       this only requires that the names be shared.
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/mfd/ocelot.h | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/ocelot.h b/include/linux/mfd/ocelot.h
> index dd72073d2d4f..b80f2f5ff1d6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/ocelot.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/ocelot.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,15 @@
>  
>  struct resource;
>  
> +#define OCELOT_RES_NAME_ANA	"ana"
> +#define OCELOT_RES_NAME_QS	"qs"
> +#define OCELOT_RES_NAME_QSYS	"qsys"
> +#define OCELOT_RES_NAME_REW	"rew"
> +#define OCELOT_RES_NAME_SYS	"sys"
> +#define OCELOT_RES_NAME_S0	"s0"
> +#define OCELOT_RES_NAME_S1	"s1"
> +#define OCELOT_RES_NAME_S2	"s2"

I've never been a fan of defining name strings.

The end of the define name is identical to the resource names.

This also makes grepping that much harder for little gain.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]