From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F59C352A1 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 01:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229850AbiLGBbS (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 20:31:18 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48788 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229511AbiLGBbQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 20:31:16 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BB0652158; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 17:31:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id p24so15688564plw.1; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 17:31:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=k7urdQE78p912qO0A7x+cXXIHloLKsW1NnErtpLTCgE=; b=PF8d6NSlKi9CbBejIf+IJfb6sGIV2inLi1UDQw0YGbamjjviRKOD3JWzJnDVQlpXLM +XF+oUZpjIUV3TJ6+WrZnarkThTgxf3wpqn6rf1kzZ1lmVQgI99WNByJ+hZMyrrtj3Ax OpMj9NyrxTrNiypIavUPCnzeYbqeuXV/T9MgUdDZMtFmhHqagqhJwSPFQUeABGoAqWiX JTsQIYMl3wxud32/MkncAmheSThngjdKGLc7V+NAawh6vrrzYy7jVF+7OOfP4Oqjm8C9 j3hSfseiaY2BFVaSFTIi8w11Firj2Edev8kItXukE8NnU2gFPbytv6awkw1eLujE/Nqi XCmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=k7urdQE78p912qO0A7x+cXXIHloLKsW1NnErtpLTCgE=; b=AMoiKQAJ8iKh6w17EZIg+XWAhkFqgvQA3V82JNQfANbzOXfNTKw87MQW1WjbIDulGU AMYd7VqwzCZnkgVBVN9aKtUVk1SKR0RpcPozBuNxBG0p4SdRodZnor14a/vsHE+v3kPw NWJ3i16aN8JfCcViA9iermXRI4gcGWqRcrdmSBGuINlIqGUXdWGcRxb6rAjLXJbN3M49 EwteFYFN2diIUIaS5Z5pd5vDyNCtRWOKwgxUeVqq8ILSisYL/Ht8DF8CsZPF93oRW0M4 D9lG3MXtGYt5x3Dm+QaHFSyduNK6zvnmIxoe/4AHkc3OODDtdQQ1AniC1pRC4ip7OZGZ YdgA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmKmg439EtRnqi6BcLND6ZgEqpL4UqdTtqJKaBseQhPtfRiJJcM j75QmhxYYiV4NHDxkPmAiQsXKa7h3JU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6muuuxbEIJAn0cAhL8ISoINjfzW0o2hKewGkvmHMwrtI+1P5hPiYKRmPvzM/rJEuIuw07Bmw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1246:b0:189:63f2:d584 with SMTP id u6-20020a170903124600b0018963f2d584mr58297572plh.156.1670376675391; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 17:31:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:9d:2:7a61:38c7:d37a:7f43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 65-20020a620544000000b00575448ab0e9sm12247461pff.123.2022.12.06.17.31.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Dec 2022 17:31:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 17:31:11 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Thomas Petazzoni , Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= , Rob Herring , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] PCI: aardvark: switch to using devm_gpiod_get_optional() Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 10:42:25AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Switch the driver to the generic version of gpiod API (and away from > OF-specific variant), so that we can stop exporting > devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(). > > Acked-by: Pali Rohár > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov > --- > > v2: > - collected reviewed-by/acked-by tags > - updated commit description to remove incorrect assumption of why > devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node() was used in the first place > > This is the last user of devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node() in the mainline > (next), it would be great to have it in so that we can remove the API in > the next release cycle. > > Thanks! Gentle ping on this one... I'd really like to remove [devm_]gpiod_get_from_of_node() API from 6.2. Thanks. -- Dmitry