From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FE7C4332F for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 16:42:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232622AbiLLQmR (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:42:17 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47328 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232929AbiLLQlc (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:41:32 -0500 Received: from netrider.rowland.org (netrider.rowland.org [192.131.102.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with SMTP id AC11E17053 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 08:39:16 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 857704 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Dec 2022 11:39:15 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:39:15 -0500 From: Alan Stern To: Johan Hovold Cc: Oliver Neukum , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Vincent Mailhol , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: drop misleading usb_set_intfdata() kernel doc Message-ID: References: <4cf7bce3-dfbb-b064-9d91-27616bf11d6a@suse.com> <2a2935e6-ae3c-85d9-a2e9-f42fb4ca7d59@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 05:08:17PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > The fact that USB core and driver core clears the pointer is an > implementation detail which in principle could change. With the new kerneldoc, the fact that the USB core clears the pointer becomes part of the API. It is no longer an implementation detail but rather a guarantee that drivers can depend on. (I.e., if it does change, all the USB drivers will need to be audited.) > The important > part is that drivers generally should not touch the struct device or > containing structure after unbind (and must do so with care otherwise). While that certainly is an important point, it is not the point of usb_set_intfdata() or its kerneldoc. The main reason for adding the kerneldoc -- Vincent's original motivation -- was to inform coders that drivers generally don't need to worry about clearing the data pointer. A subtext was that clearing the pointer while the driver is still using it can lead to problems, but I don't think we need to mention this. It's pretty obvious. Alan Stern