From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780E1C4332F for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 18:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233716AbiLTSeF (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2022 13:34:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34364 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229750AbiLTSeB (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2022 13:34:01 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDB822AD; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:34:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id u5so13262420pjy.5; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:34:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kQens0GrM1j1Pq7PUe4p3v78cyMtzaMxKYhn1IUucHA=; b=KVQH4HSEoYXfhYy9BPbxjcmJJyRJOwuUUnOrSzK3I6YMzC5VQVGARBpkUi/6ISNopy JcnWiAuY+qVBakn/K/nqnHiMJ0wwhG3Dhzpt+jTCFUzgftjDtFUy0IGYN43LRxp2/sTx /V2kXMXtYIj36VGz6bCUmknaUbyRrU4N6YFCTuZenAWeepJRw9HlvVo/M4YVTJks5G+0 Agck65PmvBL5zsRbDzU5EK1WVNSxFjZ/8XijKbwMMC3zGEaE/5bfo5plrc1HDvo+aUEL abdor5uMfBNBIs263+NtWaeKM2vEzjSCsgnfpHE5ybq1jPW0UYAZB2Dzw9wz6qnyzXV2 +q7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=kQens0GrM1j1Pq7PUe4p3v78cyMtzaMxKYhn1IUucHA=; b=NcvBy2FTdRtICJ0hysSZbgXZ5lBvdQSjO2fsOONv8quEGJKUMfgzJV+yQIH47BcF4I zXfivnVeFMAqkhNbE+rxyeeLn0q1CuV98IEOHk97soRG9NY1RyapxjxYUjuB5a2jeKW2 4nAnID9yL8z/+rd9Sg3josqwa1ISk+BqqfYvSGhDV6wbwXRpimH3jIKIugK4zFPvYzVH 2vT00HDjQc5+bl5Nr5nhTy+akQamwwlhZc6FAobT6fS2yrkm0ht7/4YqmFh1yCBnE9Ov LBycHlDf3X6lHN669/bT4uYgSOfwyVNGcAHNLiWWlALsBN2vKntPsNPC1eeKjGXi7loy OmvA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plqhqv1972pEWdcqSLbZp50s9D77hbY9gNLOeQu9keDSGrJKYLs Payw2tdWjBvq9a4ClQXdt/c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf77S0BUfRzfa17gO42AWg3BHLLiq7gzEbDlXrF3drVWMgYQM3/iXNuL1VK09NY1StV/hc64AA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b198:b0:189:fa12:c98a with SMTP id s24-20020a170902b19800b00189fa12c98amr54202554plr.66.1671561240231; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:34:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:9d:2:7206:404e:4820:d175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j4-20020a170902c3c400b00188c9c11559sm9682906plj.1.2022.12.20.10.33.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:33:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:33:56 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] gpiolib: of: remove of_gpio_count() Message-ID: References: <20221219192016.1396950-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 03:51:43PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 11:20:12AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > There are no more users of of_gpio_count() in the mainline kernel, > > remove it. > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov > > --- > > > > After 6.2-rc1 there should be no more users of the APIs mentioned in > > this series. > > I believe you probably want to have this patch applied immediately to the GPIO > subsystem after v6.2-rc1 to avoid new users. Thanks for the reviews Andy. I think Linus pulled all the changes removing these all APIs into mainline, so it is possible to get it into 6.2 right away. Since everything is supposed to go through 'next' we will probably catch new users regardless, but I indeed would not mind having this in 6.2 and not wait for 6.3. Thanks. -- Dmitry