linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt@gmail.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: meson: vdec: esparser: check parsing state with hardware write pointer
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 15:04:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8536BzbbghJt0G2@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230123094300.2816812-1-christianshewitt@gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 09:43:00AM +0000, Christian Hewitt wrote:
> From: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> 
> Also check the hardware write pointer to check if ES Parser has stalled.
> 

Presumably this is something which has happens in real life?  Say a user
has this hardware and is wondering if this patch fixes their bug, what
does this bug look like to them?

Please add a Fixes tag.

> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/esparser.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/esparser.c b/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/esparser.c
> index df5956c6141d..41b705f999b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/esparser.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/esparser.c
> @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ esparser_queue(struct amvdec_session *sess, struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *vbuf)
>  	u32 num_dst_bufs = 0;
>  	u32 offset;
>  	u32 pad_size;
> +	u32 wp, wp2;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * When max ref frame is held by VP9, this should be -= 3 to prevent a
> @@ -354,15 +355,21 @@ esparser_queue(struct amvdec_session *sess, struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *vbuf)
>  	}
>  
>  	pad_size = esparser_pad_start_code(core, vb, payload_size);
> +	wp = amvdec_read_parser(core, PARSER_VIDEO_WP);
>  	ret = esparser_write_data(core, phy, payload_size + pad_size);
> +	wp2 = amvdec_read_parser(core, PARSER_VIDEO_WP);
>  

Why is check not done inside the esparser_write_data() function?  It
really feels like doing a write where nothing happens should be a bug
for both callers...

The esparser_write_data() function returns > 0 on success, 0 on timeout
(I guess timeout is an error-ish) and negative if the user presses
CTR-C.  There are no comments to explain the unusual returns.  Could we
clean this up so it just returns negatives on error and zero on success
or if not then let's add a comment explaining what's going on?

>  	if (ret <= 0) {
> -		dev_warn(core->dev, "esparser: input parsing error\n");
> -		amvdec_remove_ts(sess, vb->timestamp);
> -		v4l2_m2m_buf_done(vbuf, VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR);
>  		amvdec_write_parser(core, PARSER_FETCH_CMD, 0);
>  
> -		return 0;
> +		if (ret < 0 || wp2 == wp) {

So in this patch if there is a timeout but something was written then
that's kind of a success path?

regards,
dan carpenter

> +			dev_err(core->dev, "esparser: input parsing error ret %d (%x <=> %x)\n",
> +				ret, wp, wp2);
> +			amvdec_remove_ts(sess, vb->timestamp);
> +			v4l2_m2m_buf_done(vbuf, VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR);
> +
> +			return 0;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	atomic_inc(&sess->esparser_queued_bufs);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-23 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-23  9:43 [PATCH] media: meson: vdec: esparser: check parsing state with hardware write pointer Christian Hewitt
2023-01-23  9:47 ` Neil Armstrong
2023-01-23 12:04 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2023-03-21 13:58   ` Hans Verkuil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y8536BzbbghJt0G2@kadam \
    --to=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=christianshewitt@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).