From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2914EC25B4E for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 18:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230137AbjATSQP (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2023 13:16:15 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34382 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229472AbjATSQN (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2023 13:16:13 -0500 Received: from netrider.rowland.org (netrider.rowland.org [192.131.102.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A9D469370B for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:15:59 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 42488 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Jan 2023 13:15:58 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 13:15:58 -0500 From: Alan Stern To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Jonas Oberhauser , Andrea Parri , Jonas Oberhauser , Peter Zijlstra , will , "boqun.feng" , npiggin , dhowells , "j.alglave" , "luc.maranget" , akiyks , dlustig , joel , urezki , quic_neeraju , frederic , Kernel development list Subject: Re: Internal vs. external barriers (was: Re: Interesting LKMM litmus test) Message-ID: References: <20230118211201.GL2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <09f084d2-6128-7f83-b2a5-cbe236b1678d@huaweicloud.com> <20230119001147.GN2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <0fae983b-2a7c-d44e-8881-53d5cc053f09@huaweicloud.com> <20230119184107.GT2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20230120035521.GA319650@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20230120173054.GM2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230120173054.GM2948950@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 09:30:54AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 11:14:06AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > My revised patch is below. > > Thank you! Are you OK with my putting this on a not-for-mainline branch > for experimental purposes? Sure, go ahead. Alan