linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Pietro Borrello <borrello@diag.uniroma1.it>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
	Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
	"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>, Jakob Koschel <jkl820.git@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: pick_next_rt_entity(): checked list_entry
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 14:43:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9fJZdMYbc4gRVJ+@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230128-list-entry-null-check-sched-v1-1-c93085ee0055@diag.uniroma1.it>


* Pietro Borrello <borrello@diag.uniroma1.it> wrote:

> Commit 326587b84078 ("sched: fix goto retry in pick_next_task_rt()")
> removed any path which could make pick_next_rt_entity() return NULL.
> However, BUG_ON(!rt_se) in _pick_next_task_rt() (the only caller of
> pick_next_rt_entity()) still checks the error condition, which can
> never happen, since list_entry() never returns NULL. Return
> list_first_entry_or_null(queue, ...) to allow BUG to check the only
> possible error condition here: the queue being empty which should
> never happen.
> 
> Fixes: 326587b84078 ("sched: fix goto retry in pick_next_task_rt()")
> Signed-off-by: Pietro Borrello <borrello@diag.uniroma1.it>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/rt.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index ed2a47e4ddae..6088d5d83b75 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -1777,7 +1777,7 @@ static struct sched_rt_entity *pick_next_rt_entity(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
>  	BUG_ON(idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO);
>  
>  	queue = array->queue + idx;
> -	next = list_entry(queue->next, struct sched_rt_entity, run_list);
> +	next = list_first_entry_or_null(queue, struct sched_rt_entity, run_list);
>  
>  	return next;

I'd much rather have something like this:

	SCHED_WARN_ON(list_empty(next));

So the debug check is part of CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y, and not if it's turned 
off. Also, this makes sure we don't crash (BUG_ON()) on the error 
condition, in the hope of getting debug info out of the system.

Thanks,

	Ingo

      reply	other threads:[~2023-01-30 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-28 16:26 [PATCH] sched: pick_next_rt_entity(): checked list_entry Pietro Borrello
2023-01-30 13:43 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y9fJZdMYbc4gRVJ+@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=borrello@diag.uniroma1.it \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=c.giuffrida@vu.nl \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=h.j.bos@vu.nl \
    --cc=jkl820.git@gmail.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).