From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C1FC433E0 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 19:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8EB64DA1 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 19:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233019AbhA0TsA (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:48:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56408 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232416AbhA0Tqa (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:46:30 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4193DC061573; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:45:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id o63so2279346pgo.6; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:45:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=JSkrFLTJr6pGJf1IDW3RWxp1Agf1ykJ+k1NVDD7G4js=; b=d4Inqoi4OETMUYSfyXBhCdXGuRtYDtzq3Mm1sOoNfYC/bQ8/E3BKpK1AkP5QYx80AQ Jtpt9j2z3fgJ7O1Iega2owyIm/3YrzGmTEcxDEMMJnGY7LCm0NExWaxsRvOjPXIFB981 CYe1KhGtImvHqiHb1NXea8IQ0XwZ/CWrNOjZQ838F6Ay0YhXu2l2k4aRVvhET/NrJp/D M9YcC8p0CwEruHayktiLitILgW19oW9eyekKOBrMuzZf8Rwt7d9rKEYN67mUAef72GZi +tv/Ol+Lxv1yout0YwokU8NGznAYvoKNzrkgzrpnOTsRE7v9YWswFTPEB5X36HzNs6HC 3INQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=JSkrFLTJr6pGJf1IDW3RWxp1Agf1ykJ+k1NVDD7G4js=; b=aS58enf+/mkq2+MU4lw9eLDCkHKPmp7jFkm6LlMG+fnZ/wBW+Os+OWw5m58UUEzq4b wOmo0pxRiTiC+jRKkf2AJG1fk7/Oh4mxo0d6sct+p0sP/x/AUjh5G4GICTpoqT49f0nW 0ZY9BTropGaF/FKw3Jjfr+Tb4YeGJVspnKP/MVwRnjsgaLzsZC5OAju7EzaXMH7myQHb G8+1V2fXBTv4gW9JFXsd5prp8T3vnWp+Gpi0JQn7W/7H0cKe7LXO8tqSFOTp3HuDgSOL IH9LmB12+JexmgyBcriBrgLSqqfXklOjEJS9Pqn0QVYrn9skEMXnSiD+/czVudT4ah+P aBEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533zsWsWDp8hJsi6K3dWbAVjkq/DhKOYKq1OYHigUjeu0SbLvu5Z GOh68m7TbbqG2khfDyCFeHhhbpZW40M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz0dniJCSTRS3V+eXeLH4AAWpwwBGf4XOuyt1J86aDlphShf4yxVvAvHTU27ch9ipyxKuxhCg== X-Received: by 2002:a62:1dd7:0:b029:1be:ef0d:9507 with SMTP id d206-20020a621dd70000b02901beef0d9507mr12188580pfd.62.1611776749630; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:45:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:202:201:a6ae:11ff:fe11:fcc3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w13sm3337613pfc.7.2021.01.27.11.45.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:45:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 11:45:45 -0800 From: "dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com" To: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" Cc: "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "maz@kernel.org" , "linuxarm@openeuler.org" , "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] add IRQF_NO_AUTOEN for request_irq Message-ID: References: <20210107223926.35284-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> <848fb07c3073401bbbe15db71f5922c9@hisilicon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 02:49:21PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 09:38:28PM +0000, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: > > Hi Thomas, Greg, Dmitry, Marc, > > Any further comment on this new API? > > It's not my subsystem, I'll let the irq maintainers handle it :) Not my subsystem either, but I would like to have this feature available. I do not like calling irq_set_status_flags() before request_irq() as at that time we are not ensured of irq ownership, and using disable_irq() afterwards is indeed awkward. Thanks. -- Dmitry