From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D50C433E0 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B4E64DA5 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230288AbhBPMIi (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 07:08:38 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49648 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230303AbhBPMHr (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 07:07:47 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3B1EC061574 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 04:07:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=X/WM4gpCq38+r8+TMCsO1Va79XdhVsx1pfVAxEAW+9k=; b=S/pMKd6tMDEHWfDraK0mMktDS6 +si9CmOwqFtm9rmEN0j9fWKYRH9/J95oi9mgcjOBvLp3ef9ewuOxvtkYRUQB06tVvPCFKivIEJbJp DYhslj2LIw+tErsYuuljO+0T3dxlJkk7FbZ50ojQfNcaPtq6/RWoFoZFZ6WzoshKybdOJf82of6ZU aE1jTj11TmoRcQS7aAaCY7+WOnrucThyM1uQTRLvB58h4YsevNrMMZndcJsk4RuXyUxjsVTAUJTKa pI3ZfoxRf5VGuuCFw85R2aEeuai9Yt7G+QiLYnbHz2RqPuDr2bnZq83ZgJJsArLvq5Y5bJict+pj6 UxdLM4GA==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lBz7J-00GpjJ-59; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:06:16 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8244A3011E6; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:06:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 67EBB203EBF0C; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:06:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 13:06:08 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Nadav Amit Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Nadav Amit , Rik van Riel , Josh Poimboeuf Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] smp: Run functions concurrently in smp_call_function_many_cond() Message-ID: References: <20210209221653.614098-1-namit@vmware.com> <20210209221653.614098-2-namit@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210209221653.614098-2-namit@vmware.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 02:16:46PM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote: > void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask, > smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait) > { > + smp_call_function_many_cond(mask, func, info, wait ? SCF_WAIT : 0, NULL); wait*SCF_WAIT is shorter and sometimes generates better code > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_many);