From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9842EC433E3 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E376195D for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230298AbhCSPvk (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:51:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44732 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230154AbhCSPv1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:51:27 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF8D3C06174A; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 08:51:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id u7so7022800qtq.12; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 08:51:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=yQLsk2Tp9wfXFgh3gpmNEHc/1LVc0qNRoZDzdBhuURQ=; b=bCWupG2mTUy75B9SdmzjE60Wm4fflLRjowQwVn0gS6PS4fBpwtA4DG4NH5Ooo3tjeb Crja/7T/8mXD/ardmLAx9Cgj9xa8d+7v4SAYzzWKKlTF9zMvmgsqI7cDS2DVMNvfaNqm LOnBD/IscqHTTRHxI0+clnR7I7MtJsFKSnRmftmwUX9WDsHYGy3JCbi8ZzuASOeNKxvN 3zwlzI1Lsg8ODU9JsRK0o+Mrj105/EzdsFRDCKYRigFK6nXnRLSH6W+8swv8w6IIZ21t yIoQbHXSuiQUxqfhpVfSgAxe4zd87/cXTnjfUxvlzRsMa6bcG9GblChEkIpSopFEyxX3 n5BA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=yQLsk2Tp9wfXFgh3gpmNEHc/1LVc0qNRoZDzdBhuURQ=; b=X2fi0yy7OZZFnKcKfsZVVIJAKkvgYn9RRTZhD8qcKR53vcWfYK4f4kHhm8RiyITOj4 3txXvoarfo9PKQRXL/gAPO06Rwclvilqk3U9O142iymCrwXQhyxLqDEEd4RBuxDCWKJ9 0tcCcujghogHSfTpecYgbkx3EYd9nubaS3FJcUKdOcR1hjmhqQ8hrmcZPSTkN70Elt2F lWHQ/AqYqNWsR04C7JCSiNiajEORBDSQcBX3znQpIcyXOdZpJB9EL61YZAG+wCI0OFzx izhVSv4gyf3/NeX1Dh9NLYtrZNU++/22ZltpjYtX02Qj+JDhUFG1DjFd1otz5UK9GTTY nXHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531W0+BQnQbJLmhpgOPrkIuybAfKhpIYQhrejCyfg+FpSCP1eRZZ dMPa6pjI3rvadJAKuS0tjR4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNqvzvMhVdlCo1/tWbfYEFMlXh88JQxyq0y9CijEHAeLnaGQDSE/InVASZ3LecfuKpQYtIQA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:49:: with SMTP id y9mr8885658qtw.0.1616169085886; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 08:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dschatzberg-fedora-PC0Y6AEN.dhcp.thefacebook.com ([2620:10d:c091:480::1:41da]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m13sm4559989qkk.16.2021.03.19.08.51.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 08:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:51:22 -0400 From: Dan Schatzberg To: Shakeel Butt Cc: Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe , Tejun Heo , Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , Hugh Dickins , Roman Gushchin , Muchun Song , Alex Shi , Alexander Duyck , Chris Down , Yafang Shao , Wei Yang , "open list:BLOCK LAYER" , open list , "open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" , "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] Charge loop device i/o to issuing cgroup Message-ID: References: <20210316153655.500806-1-schatzberg.dan@gmail.com> <7ca79335-026f-2511-2b58-0e9f32caa063@kernel.dk> <8c32421c-4bd8-ec46-f1d0-25996956f4da@kernel.dk> <20210318164625.1018062b042e540bd83bb08e@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 05:56:28PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote: > > We need something similar for mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_page() as well. > > It is better to take this series in mm tree and Jens is ok with that [1]. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/4fea89a5-0e18-0791-18a8-4c5907b0d2c4@kernel.dk/ It sounds like there are no concerns about the loop-related work in the patch series. I'll rebase on the mm tree and resubmit.