From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331F2C433E2 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C9461985 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230264AbhCSRz3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:55:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43364 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230297AbhCSRzW (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:55:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F3BDC061760 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id u5-20020a7bcb050000b029010e9316b9d5so5692685wmj.2 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:55:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=H4E5zo6M+sGFb9jJfPuBMekAUt72xfRBAZEVdNXvosI=; b=HkWCKtqano6hr83mTvHPNb1mTJD7j++xG4i3V1pZc+fMnH//eWACXOeqWIMYDAyiqD CWBkqUiJ1zmtZ3OlxFIY9DcUS/euNcLz8nxn4AxgvZ1rE5qJAgMaRKnutzlS1iCHVLZf S1ATj65HkMPVN9VP3K+xuo111cO9NYWhg1scM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to; bh=H4E5zo6M+sGFb9jJfPuBMekAUt72xfRBAZEVdNXvosI=; b=DLRhpN+p/PBASlsubipBzai9JSeJ45tMgT963eCT9kscVpQb64m3A8b0qva4sAOPqF nzQCxhEaQbkByn32sSeE739CTrtNBFHtyEiAC0W+ykRqr5SsJgWV14jt3msCYW5IMz/W dK/KtjqRzcBg9Ddg87bK1Y4atevFKbdSIER81JM+r9A4siUFV8/8C870LJceSRbvZR57 Ue0gJU10z/QWp5zmDPZDP6520X1AW7lb1BmmBYGJvBQtpxGA+VYQ/d9psnjhErNHxPok 99rPB4MFVsOOnbyLlB7VP2u0IV4cAQD5cyKR7uqBnBNNTVQabNhbXFy5xdiIwkuztI6b mnOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AqKPqhSxnM+HjkI8eRpLxanOboIglwy+m66F/JeCG20eCoziq OZCTD7SYcpuh0JrXXgJWHYi9vg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznH8/2o31By7revAgfT3dpRwhrdpC+rY/yFumwMUBtQGtz1iOu7IVxYDezg1HGlBR9UX23fg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c0c3:: with SMTP id s3mr4743813wmh.11.1616176521069; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:55:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:57f4:0:efd0:b9e5:5ae6:c2fa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s3sm7109143wmd.21.2021.03.19.10.55.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 18:55:18 +0100 From: Daniel Vetter To: Lee Jones Cc: Daniel Vetter , Roland Scheidegger , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alex Deucher , amd-gfx list , Anthony Koo , Ben Skeggs , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Colin Ian King , Dave Airlie , David Airlie , dri-devel , freedreno , Harry Wentland , Jeremy Kolb , Kuogee Hsieh , Leo Li , "moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" , linux-arm-msm , "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" , Lyude Paul , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Nouveau Dev , Qinglang Miao , Rob Clark , Rob Clark , Sean Paul , Sumit Semwal , Thomas Zimmermann , VMware Graphics , Zack Rusin Subject: Re: [RESEND 00/53] Rid GPU from W=1 warnings Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Lee Jones , Roland Scheidegger , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alex Deucher , amd-gfx list , Anthony Koo , Ben Skeggs , Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= , Colin Ian King , Dave Airlie , David Airlie , dri-devel , freedreno , Harry Wentland , Jeremy Kolb , Kuogee Hsieh , Leo Li , "moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" , linux-arm-msm , "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" , Lyude Paul , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Nouveau Dev , Qinglang Miao , Rob Clark , Rob Clark , Sean Paul , Sumit Semwal , Thomas Zimmermann , VMware Graphics , Zack Rusin References: <20210303134319.3160762-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> <16d4300e-bf29-1e85-317b-53d257890cb9@vmware.com> <20210308091932.GB4931@dell> <20210311135152.GT701493@dell> <20210317081729.GH701493@dell> <20210319082407.GG2916463@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210319082407.GG2916463@dell> X-Operating-System: Linux phenom 5.7.0-1-amd64 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 08:24:07AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:32 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:17 AM Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for > > > > > > > > 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger > > > > > > > > That said, they were already signed off by Zack, so not sure what > > > > > > > > happened here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, they were accepted at one point, then dropped without a reason. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since I rebased onto the latest -next, I had to pluck them back out of > > > > > > > a previous one. > > > > > > > > > > > > They should show up in linux-next again. We merge patches for next merge > > > > > > window even during the current merge window, but need to make sure they > > > > > > don't pollute linux-next. Occasionally the cut off is wrong so patches > > > > > > show up, and then get pulled again. > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately especially the 5.12 merge cycle was very wobbly due to some > > > > > > confusion here. But your patches should all be in linux-next again (they > > > > > > are queued up for 5.13 in drm-misc-next, I checked that). > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for the confusion here. > > > > > > > > > > Oh, I see. Well so long as they don't get dropped, I'll be happy. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the explanation Daniel > > > > > > > > After rebasing today, all of my GPU patches have remained. Would > > > > someone be kind enough to check that everything is still in order > > > > please? > > > > > > It's still broken somehow. I've kiced Maxime and Maarten again, > > > they're also on this thread. > > > > You're patches have made it into drm-next meanwhile, so they should > > show up in linux-next through that tree at least. Except if that one > > also has some trouble. > > Thanks for letting me know. > > I see some patches made it back in, others didn't. > > I'll resend the stragglers - bear with. The vmwgfx ones should all be back, the others I guess just werent ever applied. I'll vacuum them all up if you resend. Apologies for the wobbly ride. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch