linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
	Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 3/6] media: v4l UAPI: add ROI auto-controls flags
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:22:18 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFqiWixqSuPMTwXz@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiDSCseJdKuPSZFDvc8VGp=PDqGEN42ZsLVGgkwhAz5hhVCQQ@mail.gmail.com>

On (21/03/23 17:04), Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:53 AM Sergey Senozhatsky
> <senozhatsky@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > UVC 1.5 defines the following Region Of Interest auto controls:
> >
> > D0: Auto Exposure
> > D1: Auto Iris
> > D2: Auto White Balance
> > D3: Auto Focus
> > D4: Auto Face Detect
> > D5: Auto Detect and Track
> > D6: Image Stabilization
> > D7: Higher Quality
> > D8 – D15: Reserved, set to zero
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >  include/uapi/linux/v4l2-common.h | 10 ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-common.h b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-common.h
> > index 3651ebb8cb23..34f1c262d6aa 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-common.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/v4l2-common.h
> > @@ -92,6 +92,16 @@
> >  #define V4L2_SEL_FLAG_LE               (1 << 1)
> >  #define V4L2_SEL_FLAG_KEEP_CONFIG      (1 << 2)
> >
> 
> Are you sure that you do not want to start with 1<<3, there might be
> some hardware that support LE/SE

How the hardware's going to support this? There is simply no way to
pass these flags to the firmware, the values already overlap with
auto-controls. So I guess these flags are for the driver (C code).
uvcvideo driver is not doing any "lesser or equal rectangle" magic
for ROI. No such thing is defined by UVC spec.

I can move these flags to entirely different value range and do
remapping to uvc auto-controls values in uvcvideo.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-24  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-19  5:53 [PATCHv3 0/6] media: uvcvideo: implement UVC 1.5 ROI Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-19  5:53 ` [PATCHv3 1/6] media: v4l UAPI: add ROI selection targets Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-19  5:53 ` [PATCHv3 2/6] media: v4l UAPI: document " Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-23 16:05   ` Ricardo Ribalda
2021-03-19  5:53 ` [PATCHv3 3/6] media: v4l UAPI: add ROI auto-controls flags Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-23 16:04   ` Ricardo Ribalda
2021-03-24  2:22     ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2021-03-24  7:28       ` Ricardo Ribalda
2021-03-24  7:35         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-19  5:53 ` [PATCHv3 4/6] media: v4l UAPI: document " Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-19  5:53 ` [PATCHv3 5/6] media: uvcvideo: add UVC 1.5 ROI control Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-23 16:16   ` Ricardo Ribalda
2021-03-24  2:01     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-24  2:14       ` Tomasz Figa
2021-03-24  2:31         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-24  2:34           ` Tomasz Figa
2021-03-24  2:52             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-24  3:00               ` Tomasz Figa
2021-03-24  3:05                 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-24  3:08                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-19  5:53 ` [PATCHv3 6/6] MAINTAINERS: update Senozhatsky email address Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-03-19  5:56   ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YFqiWixqSuPMTwXz@google.com \
    --to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=ribalda@chromium.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).