linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Martin Sebor" <msebor@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, "Ning Sun" <ning.sun@intel.com>,
	"Kalle Valo" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	"Simon Kelley" <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>,
	"James Smart" <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Anders Larsen" <al@alarsen.net>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Serge Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	"Imre Deak" <imre.deak@intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	"José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>,
	"Matt Roper" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
	"Aditya Swarup" <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: avoid stringop-overread warning on pri_latency
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 19:22:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFt1aBFwJI+z97g3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874kh04lin.fsf@intel.com>

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 05:30:24PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > gcc-11 warns about what appears to be an out-of-range array access:
> >
> > In function ‘snb_wm_latency_quirk’,
> >     inlined from ‘ilk_setup_wm_latency’ at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3108:3:
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3057:9: error: ‘intel_print_wm_latency’ reading 16 bytes from a region of size 10 [-Werror=stringop-overread]
> >  3057 |         intel_print_wm_latency(dev_priv, "Primary", dev_priv->wm.pri_latency);
> >       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: In function ‘ilk_setup_wm_latency’:
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3057:9: note: referencing argument 3 of type ‘const u16 *’ {aka ‘const short unsigned int *’}
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:2994:13: note: in a call to function ‘intel_print_wm_latency’
> >  2994 | static void intel_print_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >       |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > My guess is that this code is actually safe because the size of the
> > array depends on the hardware generation, and the function checks for
> > that, but at the same time I would not expect the compiler to work it
> > out correctly, and the code seems a little fragile with regards to
> > future changes. Simply increasing the size of the array should help.
> 
> Agreed, I don't think there's an issue, but the code could use a bunch
> of improvements.
> 
> Like, we have intel_print_wm_latency() for debug logging and
> wm_latency_show() for debugfs, and there's a bunch of duplication and
> ugh.

There is all this ancient stuff in review limbo...
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/50802/

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-24 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-22 16:02 [PATCH 00/11] treewide: address gcc-11 -Wstringop-overread warnings Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86: compressed: avoid gcc-11 -Wstringop-overread warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 23:30   ` [tip: x86/boot] x86/boot/compressed: Avoid " tip-bot2 for Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86: tboot: avoid Wstringop-overread-warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 20:29   ` Ingo Molnar
2021-03-22 21:39     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 22:07     ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-22 22:49       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 23:13       ` Ingo Molnar
2021-03-24  9:11       ` David Laight
2021-03-24 10:39         ` David Laight
2021-03-22 23:30   ` [tip: x86/boot] x86/boot/tboot: Avoid Wstringop-overread-warning tip-bot2 for Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 03/11] security: commoncap: fix -Wstringop-overread warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:31   ` Christian Brauner
2021-03-24 20:50   ` James Morris
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 04/11] ath11: Wstringop-overread warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-28  9:04   ` Kalle Valo
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 05/11] qnx: avoid -Wstringop-overread warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 06/11] cgroup: fix -Wzero-length-bounds warnings Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-30  8:41   ` Michal Koutný
2021-03-30  9:00     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-30 14:44       ` Michal Koutný
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 07/11] ARM: sharpsl_param: work around -Wstringop-overread warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 08/11] atmel: avoid gcc -Wstringop-overflow warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 09/11] scsi: lpfc: fix gcc -Wstringop-overread warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: avoid stringop-overread warning on pri_latency Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-24 15:30   ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-24 17:22     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2021-03-22 16:02 ` [PATCH 11/11] [RFC] drm/i915/dp: fix array overflow warning Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-25  8:05   ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-25  9:53     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-03-25 14:49       ` Martin Sebor
2021-03-30 10:56   ` Hans de Goede
2021-04-06  4:53 ` [PATCH 00/11] treewide: address gcc-11 -Wstringop-overread warnings Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YFt1aBFwJI+z97g3@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aditya.swarup@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=al@alarsen.net \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=msebor@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ning.sun@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=simon@thekelleys.org.uk \
    --cc=tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).