From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Allow drivers to return EOPNOTSUPP from config
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 18:25:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YGHxejGI2x4X3EEe@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ceb7dc5c2fa376470ab9274020fddf1c2f1584f.camel@perches.com>
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 08:08:52AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-03-29 at 14:59 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 2:43 PM Matti Vaittinen
> > <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The checkpacth instructs to switch from ENOSUPP to EOPNOTSUPP.
> > > > WARNING: ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP
> > >
> > > Make the gpiolib allow drivers to return both so driver developers
> > > can avoid one of the checkpatch complaints.
> >
> > Internally we are fine to use the ENOTSUPP.
> > Checkpatch false positives there.
> >
> > I doubt we need this change. Rather checkpatch should rephrase this to
> > point out that this is only applicable to _user-visible_ error path.
> > Cc'ed Joe.
>
> Adding CC for Jakub Kicinski who added that particular rule/test.
>
> And the output message report of the rule is merely a suggestion indicating
> a preference. It's always up to an individual to accept/reject.
>
> At best, perhaps wordsmithing the checkpatch message might be an OK option.
Thanks, Joe!
Jakub, what do you think?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-29 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-29 11:40 [PATCH 0/2] gpiolib: misc fixups Matti Vaittinen
2021-03-29 11:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: sysfs: Obey valid_mask Matti Vaittinen
2021-03-29 11:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-31 7:56 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-03-31 12:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-31 18:29 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-04-01 3:56 ` Matti Vaittinen
2021-03-29 11:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Allow drivers to return EOPNOTSUPP from config Matti Vaittinen
2021-03-29 11:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-29 12:20 ` Matti Vaittinen
2021-03-29 13:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-30 4:32 ` Matti Vaittinen
2021-03-30 10:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-31 8:10 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-03-29 15:08 ` Joe Perches
2021-03-29 15:25 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2021-03-29 17:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YGHxejGI2x4X3EEe@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
--cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).