From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D11DC433E1 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5566195D for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:22:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233595AbhCaGWF (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 02:22:05 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:54436 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233720AbhCaGVu (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 02:21:50 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D07DF619B1; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 06:21:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1617171709; bh=z20supYcVL/LvSq/d8Ls3AOwnRy5Vs7C0oP/A17PU6Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hJTg3C/n66D6a1OsOxkc8zngBVxFPzUrbHsSDgfYvOSAYLK1anUzaE74l935wEfcK OcbbaFo7jJ3sk4WJCeoMuaPHJJhEMXi8AW1lKaLJZk/PHfTZXMgtfS4KZSPBBLqTm9 D+rZlr33CVzaXIl1Eq8wllmdcq6OL7wZNyrfvN/w= Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 08:21:46 +0200 From: Greg KH To: cristian.birsan@microchip.com Cc: linux@roeck-us.net, heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] usb: typec: Add driver for Microchip sama7g5 tcpc Message-ID: References: <20210330205442.981649-1-cristian.birsan@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210330205442.981649-1-cristian.birsan@microchip.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:54:40PM +0300, cristian.birsan@microchip.com wrote: > From: Cristian Birsan > > This patch set adds initial driver support for Microchip USB Type-C Port > Controller (TCPC) embedded in sama7g5 SoC. > > The controller does not implement power delivery and the driver uses dummy > functions to register the port with TCPM. The current silicon version is > not able to trigger interrupts so the driver will poll for changes on > CC1/CC2 lines. > > Support for sink is implemented and tested with an USB device. The plan is > to extend the driver and add source support. Why are these marked "RFC"? Do you really not think they should be accepted? Why not, what is left to do with them? I do not normally review "RFC" patches as the authors do not think they should be merged, and we have plenty of patches that are being asked to be merged already :) thanks, greg k-h