linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Neil Sun <neilsun@yunify.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: drop_slab_node with task's memcg
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 13:39:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YGxIVDXw7wtBytIg@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4dba277d-e497-5c34-0e68-fd2283585de2@yunify.com>

On Tue 06-04-21 19:30:22, Neil Sun wrote:
> On 2021/4/6 15:21, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > 
> > You are changing semantic of the existing user interface. This knob has
> > never been memcg aware and it is supposed to have a global impact. I do
> > not think we can simply change that without some users being surprised
> > or even breaking them.
> 
> Yes, do you think add new interface to sysfs is a good way? such as
> /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/lxc/i-vbe1u8o7/memory.kmem.drop_caches

There were other attempts to add a memcg specific alternative to
drop_caches. A lack of a strong usecase has been a reason that no such
attempt has been merged until now. drop_caches is a problematic
interface because it is really coarse and people have learned to (ab)use
it to workaround problem rather than fix them properly.

What is your usecase?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-06 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-02 10:38 [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: drop_slab_node with task's memcg Neil Sun
2021-04-02 14:38 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-02 14:50 ` kernel test robot
2021-04-06  7:21 ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]   ` <4dba277d-e497-5c34-0e68-fd2283585de2@yunify.com>
2021-04-06 11:39     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2021-04-06 14:34       ` Neil Sun
2021-04-06 14:39         ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-06 15:12           ` Neil Sun
2021-04-06 17:38             ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YGxIVDXw7wtBytIg@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=neilsun@yunify.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).