From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C758C43460 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF9561261 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241599AbhDLND6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:03:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36076 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239916AbhDLND5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:03:57 -0400 Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de (postout2.mail.lrz.de [IPv6:2001:4ca0:0:103::81bb:ff8a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78F09C061574; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 06:03:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FJpny3XsKzyW5; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:03:34 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: postout.lrz.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=tum.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tum.de; h= in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:content-type :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:subject:from:from :date:date:received:received; s=postout; t=1618232614; bh=PQuezw +/EQQNYIxoFckyY++qYp//ZBdNYNI/RklVJcQ=; b=qerAbPe6YnbofuvRvUmMrd MzuNns2SwFLbYOtl8QHJ3OuYyBu/3kHxHMcGfC6ppx2BnUfsz5FrskGOof1SFe9M 2twgj2GjSxWNylFrcecMUu2ZyuijTk/Iago+aSUD/xTu9VynzSduThqpXVEqjf/e //wZKaS19OE5+tVk4e+eC2Ul04nhSr+Mxi2c58R+flXrhWyoiKwZxOd3yfWj5SoK tM57TcduveWHMIWRBDQ9Ds1x7JzQn7dSRp4h6cr6z9Vixb9HYpT+clI2yC/dB5wx tpBFh5ZNI4D9s5JJs+LTul2NyKRQM7MfBlMIeebx417ynWRcO169UAY0PPNKJCdQ == X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at lrz.de in lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de Received: from postout2.mail.lrz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de (lxmhs52.srv.lrz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with LMTP id OuIfMKVfWllN; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:03:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from endor.yaviniv (unknown [IPv6:2001:4ca0:0:f294:bce0:50e2:fadb:742a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by postout2.mail.lrz.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FJpnx4tPhzyW6; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:03:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:03:31 +0200 From: Andrei Rabusov To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/188] 5.10.30-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20210412084013.643370347@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210412084013.643370347@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello all, On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:38:34AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.30 release. > There are 188 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:39:44 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.30-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h I tested 5.10.30-rc1 on my i686, the kernel was compiled with gcc 10.2 using make localmodconfig. I found no issues to compile and run the kernel. Selftest resluts [ok/not ok]: [1434/82] "Regression" (compared with 5.10.29-rc1): 75d74 < not ok 1 selftests: rtc: rtctest # TIMEOUT 90 seconds 80d78 < not ok 9 selftests: timers: rtcpie # exit=255 These test results were fluctuating for the previous kernels as well, thus I can't conclude that this "regression" is actually a real regression. Tested-by: Andrei Rabusov