From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] mm,hugetlb: Clear HPageFreed outside of the lock
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:09:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YHbNUjU1Y4sqMVBd@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414104953.GF20886@linux>
On Wed 14-04-21 12:49:53, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:32:58PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > > I checked, and when we get there in __alloc_bootmem_huge_page, page->private is
> > > still zeroed, so I guess it should be safe to assume that we do not really need
> > > to clear the flag in __prep_new_huge_page() routine?
> >
> > It would be quite nasty if the struct pages content would be undefined.
> > Maybe that is possible but then I would rather stick the initialization
> > into __alloc_bootmem_huge_page.
>
> Yes, but I do not think that is really possible unless I missed something.
Yeah, it should be fine. I was thinking of a alloc, modify struct pages,
free back to the bootmem allocator sequence. But I do not remember ever
seeing sequence like that. Bootmem allocator users tend to be simple,
allocate storage and either retain it for the life time. Other than
PageReserved bit they do not touch metadata. If we want to be paranoid
then we can add VM_WARN_ON for unexpected state when allocating from the
bootmem. But I am not sure this is really worth it.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-13 10:47 [PATCH v7 0/7] Make alloc_contig_range handle Hugetlb pages Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 10:47 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] mm,page_alloc: Bail out earlier on -ENOMEM in alloc_contig_migrate_range Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 17:00 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-13 10:47 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] mm,compaction: Let isolate_migratepages_{range,block} return error codes Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 17:52 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-14 11:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-15 8:42 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 10:47 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] mm,hugetlb: Clear HPageFreed outside of the lock Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 13:23 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-13 21:19 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-14 6:04 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-14 7:41 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-14 8:28 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-14 10:01 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-14 10:03 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-14 10:32 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-14 10:49 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-14 11:09 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2021-04-14 12:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-14 16:45 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-13 10:47 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] mm,hugetlb: Split prep_new_huge_page functionality Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 13:24 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-13 13:26 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-13 21:33 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-14 4:59 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-14 12:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-14 17:03 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-13 10:47 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle free hugetlb pages Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 13:40 ` Michal Hocko
2021-04-15 8:29 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 22:29 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-14 4:54 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-14 12:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-15 8:28 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 10:47 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle in-use " Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 22:48 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-14 4:52 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-04-14 17:07 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-04-13 10:47 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] mm,page_alloc: Drop unnecessary checks from pfn_range_valid_contig Oscar Salvador
2021-04-13 22:53 ` Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YHbNUjU1Y4sqMVBd@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).