From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1128C433ED for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 11:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D5F61181 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 11:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231925AbhDXLPQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2021 07:15:16 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:35603 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231203AbhDXLPO (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Apr 2021 07:15:14 -0400 IronPort-SDR: S13mW18+cSUIDnLJ9ODiLK73tSr2YaVykZZYiFcUrmhXZFnHjL3VofrQ2Xg4fdnnxpr1oC6MZw sFCDWs7VmHMg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9963"; a="183304092" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,248,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="183304092" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Apr 2021 04:14:36 -0700 IronPort-SDR: RlYoDBKcO4fEiCXNuBpmsJZuNUxTc/o6rIXFz6YvEh9Fqdw53uvqaIzZ9vd70ctiO8BAa6uigh ciko9hHUUnWA== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,248,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="386603881" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Apr 2021 04:14:33 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1laGF4-006ozO-7I; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:14:30 +0300 Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:14:30 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: linux-gpio , arm-soc , LKML , Shubhrajyoti Datta , Srinivas Neeli , Michal Simek , Linus Walleij , Yury Norov , Rasmus Villemoes , Syed Nayyar Waris , William Breathitt Gray Subject: Re: [RFT, PATCH v1 0/5] gpio: xilinx: convert to use bitmap API Message-ID: References: <20210408145601.68651-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 10:41:26PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 4:55 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > The change in the series has been inspired by [1], which, I think, > > can be improved. Here I present the view how it can be done. > > > > The series marked as RFT since I have no hardware and I perform > > compile test only. > > > > The patches 1 and 2 can be (independently) applied for v5.13, but I'm not in > > hurry with the series, due to above (lack of real testing). So I'm flexible in > > a way how it can be proceed. > > bitmap: Make bitmap_remap() and bitmap_bitremap() available to users > > gpio: xilinx: Correct kernel doc for xgpio_probe() Bart, thanks for the warm words, just pointing out that patches 1 and 2 has been reviewed and may be applied for v5.13 cycle. Up to you. > I usually trust Andy with his work but is there any chance we can get > a Tested-by before the merge window? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko