From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3086AC433ED
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 14 May 2021 07:03:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B1161446
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 14 May 2021 07:03:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S232927AbhENHE7 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 14 May 2021 03:04:59 -0400
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:53648 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S231433AbhENHE6 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 14 May 2021 03:04:58 -0400
Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0b2c00f343c5c4aba7bf62.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0b:2c00:f343:c5c4:aba7:bf62])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 8A0191EC04DA;
        Fri, 14 May 2021 09:03:46 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim;
        t=1620975826;
        h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
         to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
         content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:  references:references;
        bh=+Epdrh9IX2imRM6A96yZbN61YvPJ3t4Bk/fWKvSIFqs=;
        b=nKDGEKQ2v8ObJgupHCG72d6Y/9fgmJKrMKYlSpfo13QSqwWuSFzanxd5aVVT8AIDCzSius
        Btt+TvXKc7PICgCZJb8oIYTJ0LzoO+eipBBQ/esHn3pX9kZ+3k6P+EIbfDMxw0jTCeoUH+
        4wjSJwDu6M3DuTIzNqCp+Uz9gnzE1Kc=
Date:   Fri, 14 May 2021 09:03:48 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     "Joshi, Mukul" <Mukul.Joshi@amd.com>
Cc:     Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>, x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>,
        "Kasiviswanathan, Harish" <Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Register bad page handler for Aldebaran
Message-ID: <YJ4g1MagVNQOvyvj@zn.tnic>
References: <YJuhs1WsqtJ7ta1L@zn.tnic>
 <DM4PR12MB5263797EB7B2D37C21427A88EE529@DM4PR12MB5263.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
 <YJxDIhGnZ5XdukiS@zn.tnic>
 <DM4PR12MB52631035F875B77974FA8D21EE519@DM4PR12MB5263.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
 <YJz3CMBFFIDBzVwX@zn.tnic>
 <CADnq5_Or5maEWTZFzS6iksyoFC=q9=y=-YmPTdPuWRKFhdw0yg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YJ04D8a6LaVRMuGH@zn.tnic>
 <CADnq5_NQonmqtFDpfsWygGzA2kv-W-daDSkxkY2ALf9a1eby9g@mail.gmail.com>
 <YJ0+YbwSpxTrghpo@zn.tnic>
 <DM4PR12MB5263A7ABC342C37CE6891707EE519@DM4PR12MB5263.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR12MB5263A7ABC342C37CE6891707EE519@DM4PR12MB5263.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 11:14:30PM +0000, Joshi, Mukul wrote:
> Are you OK with a new MCE priority (MCE_PRIO_ACCEL) or do you want us to use
> something else?

I still don't know why a separate priority is needed. Maybe this still
needs answering:

> It is a deferred interrupt that generates an MCE.

Is that the same deferred interrupt which calls
amd_deferred_error_interrupt() ?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette