From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, swap: Remove unnecessary smp_rmb() in swap_type_to_swap_info()
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 14:04:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YJ5nPolKPE6xgVsV@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210514015946.nivgnoobef4nqwmw@oracle.com>
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 09:59:46PM -0400, Daniel Jordan wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 02:46:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Ah, I think I see what you meant to say, it would perhaps help if you
> > write it like so:
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> > index 149e77454e3c..94735248dcd2 100644
> > --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> > +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> > @@ -99,11 +99,10 @@ atomic_t nr_rotate_swap = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> >
> > static struct swap_info_struct *swap_type_to_swap_info(int type)
> > {
> > - if (type >= READ_ONCE(nr_swapfiles))
> > + if (type >= MAX_SWAPFILES)
> > return NULL;
> >
> > - smp_rmb(); /* Pairs with smp_wmb in alloc_swap_info. */
> > - return READ_ONCE(swap_info[type]);
> > + return READ_ONCE(swap_info[type]); /* rcu_dereference() */
> > }
> >
> > static inline unsigned char swap_count(unsigned char ent)
> > @@ -2869,14 +2868,11 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *alloc_swap_info(void)
> > }
> > if (type >= nr_swapfiles) {
> > p->type = type;
> > - WRITE_ONCE(swap_info[type], p);
> > /*
> > - * Write swap_info[type] before nr_swapfiles, in case a
> > - * racing procfs swap_start() or swap_next() is reading them.
> > - * (We never shrink nr_swapfiles, we never free this entry.)
> > + * Publish the swap_info_struct.
> > */
> > - smp_wmb();
> > - WRITE_ONCE(nr_swapfiles, nr_swapfiles + 1);
> > + smp_store_release(&swap_info[type], p); /* rcu_assign_pointer() */
> > + nr_swapfiles++;
>
> Yes, this does help, I didn't understand why smp_wmb stayed around in
> the original post.
>
> I think the only access smp_store_release() orders is p->type. Wouldn't
> it be kinda inconsistent to only initialize that one field before
> publishing when many others would be done at the end of
> alloc_swap_info() after the fact? p->type doesn't seem special. For
> instance, get_swap_page_of_type() touches si->lock soon after it calls
> swap_type_to_swap_info(), so there could be a small window where there's
> a non-NULL si with an uninitialized lock.
>
> It's not as if this is likely to be a problem in practice, it would just
> make it harder to understand why smp_store_release is there. Maybe all
> we need is a WRITE_ONCE, or if it's really necessary for certain fields
> to be set before publication then move them up and explain?
You also care about the zero fill from kvzalloc(). Without the
smp_store_release() the zero-fill from the memset() might only be
visible 'late'.
Unless that also isn't a problem?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-14 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-13 6:48 [PATCH] mm, swap: Remove unnecessary smp_rmb() in swap_type_to_swap_info() Huang Ying
2021-05-13 8:49 ` Miaohe Lin
2021-05-13 9:54 ` Muchun Song
2021-05-13 11:27 ` Miaohe Lin
2021-05-13 12:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-13 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-14 1:59 ` Daniel Jordan
2021-05-14 4:02 ` Huang, Ying
2021-05-14 20:49 ` Daniel Jordan
2021-05-14 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-05-14 20:51 ` Daniel Jordan
2021-05-14 3:27 ` Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YJ5nPolKPE6xgVsV@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).