From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB143C43460 for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 14:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD2661461 for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 14:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231580AbhENO04 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2021 10:26:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51754 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230074AbhENO0z (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2021 10:26:55 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68F4EC061574; Fri, 14 May 2021 07:25:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=BbcGrR529XTR3me89zOS66XctwsLFXUqyNVxsijFVkA=; b=FXPIqBrVRdxBveCAtq5gzhNS7K +FET6VNdNKzgbUGdOJ4e/myYq/uROyc1j1AXL0peur5NgF+nRGnku3KSgkNkN0UVNpWSpMnNYAxEu Sp5oEo4L+LowPkd2orBdknBGHQg4AfW5ddsqdeXMFIANC5iRTDt3gelgvnBZFvEeDAGbFt2hWpjZq xk86PMqAKQB+L60Ve2GTJUIdCVR/KdASMa1ZZeDOfuL1fSx4MlXjhycD0hxzavWQmRSj0eOdvNirW O8WDyoJt5ewuHKSyFjJIo9+B+FQdoIIv2vqtEAZcEvUrQTH0ft3WE2U+Ld6NP+tIyrTBWj+odZ94Q zimReI3A==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lhYjq-00ARDU-Nf; Fri, 14 May 2021 14:25:01 +0000 Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 15:24:26 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zi Yan , Christoph Hellwig , Jeff Layton Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 07/33] mm: Add folio_get Message-ID: References: <20210511214735.1836149-1-willy@infradead.org> <20210511214735.1836149-8-willy@infradead.org> <88a265ab-9ecd-18b7-c150-517a5c2e5041@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <88a265ab-9ecd-18b7-c150-517a5c2e5041@suse.cz> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 01:56:46PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > Nitpick: function names in subject should IMHO also end with (). But not a > reason for resend all patches that don't... Hm, I thought it was preferred to not do that. I can fix it easily enough when I go through and add the R-b.