From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> To: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Cc: dave.hansen@intel.com, luto@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, rppt@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/9] x86, mm: Use cache of page tables Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 10:51:55 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YJJcqyrMEJipbevT@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210505003032.489164-6-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 05:30:28PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote: > @@ -54,6 +98,8 @@ void ___pte_free_tlb(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct page *pte) > { > pgtable_pte_page_dtor(pte); > paravirt_release_pte(page_to_pfn(pte)); > + /* Set Page Table so swap knows how to free it */ > + __SetPageTable(pte); > paravirt_tlb_remove_table(tlb, pte); > } > > @@ -70,12 +116,16 @@ void ___pmd_free_tlb(struct mmu_gather *tlb, pmd_t *pmd) > tlb->need_flush_all = 1; > #endif > pgtable_pmd_page_dtor(page); > + /* Set Page Table so swap nows how to free it */ > + __SetPageTable(virt_to_page(pmd)); > paravirt_tlb_remove_table(tlb, page); > } > > #if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 3 > void ___pud_free_tlb(struct mmu_gather *tlb, pud_t *pud) > { > + /* Set Page Table so swap nows how to free it */ > + __SetPageTable(virt_to_page(pud)); > paravirt_release_pud(__pa(pud) >> PAGE_SHIFT); > paravirt_tlb_remove_table(tlb, virt_to_page(pud)); > } > @@ -83,6 +133,8 @@ void ___pud_free_tlb(struct mmu_gather *tlb, pud_t *pud) > #if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 4 > void ___p4d_free_tlb(struct mmu_gather *tlb, p4d_t *p4d) > { > + /* Set Page Table so swap nows how to free it */ > + __SetPageTable(virt_to_page(p4d)); > paravirt_release_p4d(__pa(p4d) >> PAGE_SHIFT); > paravirt_tlb_remove_table(tlb, virt_to_page(p4d)); > } This, to me, seems like a really weird place to __SetPageTable(), why can't we do that on allocation? > @@ -888,6 +889,12 @@ void release_pages(struct page **pages, int nr) > continue; > } > > + if (PageTable(page)) { > + __ClearPageTable(page); > + free_table(page); > + continue; > + } > + > if (!put_page_testzero(page)) > continue; > > diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c > index 3cdee7b11da9..a60ec3d4ab21 100644 > --- a/mm/swap_state.c > +++ b/mm/swap_state.c > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > #include <linux/swap_slots.h> > #include <linux/huge_mm.h> > #include <linux/shmem_fs.h> > +#include <asm/pgalloc.h> > #include "internal.h" > > /* > @@ -310,6 +311,11 @@ static inline void free_swap_cache(struct page *page) > void free_page_and_swap_cache(struct page *page) > { > free_swap_cache(page); > + if (PageTable(page)) { > + __ClearPageTable(page); > + free_table(page); > + return; > + } > if (!is_huge_zero_page(page)) > put_page(page); > } And then free_table() can __ClearPageTable() and all is nice and symmetric and all this weirdness goes away, no?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-05 8:52 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-05 0:30 [PATCH RFC 0/9] PKS write protected " Rick Edgecombe 2021-05-05 0:30 ` [PATCH RFC 1/9] list: Support getting most recent element in list_lru Rick Edgecombe 2021-05-05 0:30 ` [PATCH RFC 2/9] list: Support list head not in object for list_lru Rick Edgecombe 2021-05-05 0:30 ` [PATCH RFC 3/9] x86/mm/cpa: Add grouped page allocations Rick Edgecombe 2021-05-05 12:08 ` Mike Rapoport 2021-05-05 13:09 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-05-05 18:45 ` Mike Rapoport 2021-05-05 21:57 ` Edgecombe, Rick P 2021-05-09 9:39 ` Mike Rapoport 2021-05-10 19:38 ` Edgecombe, Rick P 2021-05-05 0:30 ` [PATCH RFC 4/9] mm: Explicitly zero page table lock ptr Rick Edgecombe 2021-05-05 0:30 ` [PATCH RFC 5/9] x86, mm: Use cache of page tables Rick Edgecombe 2021-05-05 8:51 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message] 2021-05-05 12:09 ` Mike Rapoport 2021-05-05 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-05-05 21:54 ` Edgecombe, Rick P 2021-05-06 17:59 ` Matthew Wilcox 2021-05-06 18:24 ` Shakeel Butt 2021-05-07 16:27 ` Edgecombe, Rick P 2021-05-05 0:30 ` [PATCH RFC 6/9] x86/mm/cpa: Add set_memory_pks() Rick Edgecombe 2021-05-05 0:30 ` [PATCH RFC 7/9] x86/mm/cpa: Add perm callbacks to grouped pages Rick Edgecombe 2021-05-05 0:30 ` [PATCH RFC 8/9] x86, mm: Protect page tables with PKS Rick Edgecombe 2021-05-05 0:30 ` [PATCH RFC 9/9] x86, cpa: PKS protect direct map page tables Rick Edgecombe 2021-05-05 2:03 ` [PATCH RFC 0/9] PKS write protected " Ira Weiny 2021-05-05 6:25 ` Kees Cook 2021-05-05 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-05-05 18:38 ` Kees Cook 2021-05-05 19:51 ` Edgecombe, Rick P 2021-05-06 0:00 ` Ira Weiny 2021-05-05 11:08 ` Vlastimil Babka 2021-05-05 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-05-05 19:46 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YJJcqyrMEJipbevT@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \ --to=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \ --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \ --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \ --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \ --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=luto@kernel.org \ --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \ --cc=rppt@kernel.org \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH RFC 5/9] x86, mm: Use cache of page tables' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).