From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 13/22] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 09:56:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YK9Qrlr3dJt0Kjkp@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210526170206.GB19758@willie-the-truck>
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 06:02:06PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 06:30:08PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 04:14:23PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > @@ -2426,20 +2421,166 @@ static int __set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p,
> > >
> > > __do_set_cpus_allowed(p, new_mask, flags);
> > >
> > > - return affine_move_task(rq, p, &rf, dest_cpu, flags);
> > > + if (flags & SCA_USER)
> > > + release_user_cpus_ptr(p);
> > > +
> > > + return affine_move_task(rq, p, rf, dest_cpu, flags);
> > >
> > > out:
> > > - task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
> > > + task_rq_unlock(rq, p, rf);
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> >
> > So sys_sched_setaffinity() releases the user_cpus_ptr thingy ?! How does
> > that work?
>
> Right, I think if the task explicitly changes its affinity then it makes
> sense to forget about what it had before. It then behaves very similar to
> CPU hotplug, which is the analogy I've been trying to follow: if you call
> sched_setaffinity() with a mask containing offline CPUs then those CPUs
> are not added back to the affinity mask when they are onlined.
Oh right, crap semantics all the way down :/ I always forget how
horrible they are.
You're right though; this is consistent with the current mess.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-27 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-25 15:14 [PATCH v7 00/22] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 01/22] sched: Favour predetermined active CPU as migration destination Will Deacon
2021-05-26 11:14 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-26 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-26 12:36 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-26 16:03 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 17:46 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 02/22] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 03/22] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 04/22] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched " Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 05/22] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 06/22] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 07/22] sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 08/22] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1 Will Deacon
2021-05-26 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-26 16:07 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 09/22] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 10/22] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2021-05-26 15:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-26 16:12 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 17:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-26 18:59 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 11/22] sched: Introduce task_struct::user_cpus_ptr to track requested affinity Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 12/22] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 13/22] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems Will Deacon
2021-05-26 16:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-26 16:35 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-26 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-26 17:02 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 7:56 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 14/22] sched: Introduce task_cpus_dl_admissible() to check proposed affinity Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 15/22] freezer: Add frozen_or_skipped() helper function Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 16/22] sched: Defer wakeup in ttwu() for unschedulable frozen tasks Will Deacon
2021-05-27 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-27 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-27 14:44 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-27 14:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-27 14:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-28 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-27 14:36 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-01 8:21 ` [RFC][PATCH] freezer,sched: Rewrite core freezer logic Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-01 11:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-02 12:54 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-03 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-03 10:58 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-03 11:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-06-03 11:36 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 17/22] arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 18/22] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 19/22] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 20/22] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 21/22] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores Will Deacon
2021-05-25 15:14 ` [PATCH v7 22/22] Documentation: arm64: describe asymmetric 32-bit support Will Deacon
2021-05-25 17:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-25 17:27 ` Will Deacon
2021-05-25 18:11 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-26 16:00 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YK9Qrlr3dJt0Kjkp@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).