linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] init: Print out unknown kernel parameters
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 10:23:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKIoFcsrILdZSxfp@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511211009.42259-1-ahalaney@redhat.com>

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 04:10:09PM -0500, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> It is easy to foobar setting a kernel parameter on the command line
> without realizing it, there's not much output that you can use to
> assess what the kernel did with that parameter by default.
> 
> Make it a little more explicit which parameters on the command line
> _looked_ like a valid parameter for the kernel, but did not match
> anything and ultimately got tossed to init. This is very similar to the
> unknown parameter message received when loading a module.
> 
> This assumes the parameters are processed in a normal fashion, some
> parameters (dyndbg= for example) don't register their
> parameter with the rest of the kernel's parameters, and therefore
> always show up in this list (and are also given to init - like the
> rest of this list).
> 
> Another example is BOOT_IMAGE= is highlighted as an offender, which it
> technically is, but is passed by LILO and GRUB so most systems will see
> that complaint.
> 
> An example output where "foobared" and "unrecognized" are intentionally
> invalid parameters:
> 
>   Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.12-dirty debug log_buf_len=4M foobared unrecognized=foo
>   Unknown command line parameters: foobared BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.12-dirty unrecognized=foo
> 
> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
> It's my first time sending a v2 via email, please let me know if I've
> messed that up in anyway. I decided it wasn't worth the effort to do
> "autocorrect" functionality Borislav was pondering about, feel free to
> disagree on that if you have a strong opinion.

Oh well, I guess let's first see how this works in practice.

Looks ok to me:

Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-17  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11 21:10 [PATCH v2] init: Print out unknown kernel parameters Andrew Halaney
2021-05-12 23:00 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-05-13 13:00   ` Andrew Halaney
2021-05-13 16:06     ` Randy Dunlap
2021-05-17  8:23 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YKIoFcsrILdZSxfp@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=ahalaney@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).