From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BF6C47076 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 16:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A25460698 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 16:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237607AbhEUQny (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 12:43:54 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:50990 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233011AbhEUQnx (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 12:43:53 -0400 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (96-72-84-49-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [96.72.84.49] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 14LGgHSc005320 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 21 May 2021 12:42:18 -0400 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 60FAD420119; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:42:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 12:42:16 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Jan Kara Cc: Xing Zhengjun , kernel test robot , LKML , lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com Subject: Re: [LKP] [ext4] 05c2c00f37: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.8% regression Message-ID: References: <20210227120804.GB22871@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <20210520095119.GA18952@quack2.suse.cz> <20210521092730.GE18952@quack2.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210521092730.GE18952@quack2.suse.cz> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:27:30AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > OK, thanks for testing. So the orphan code is indeed the likely cause of > this regression but I probably did not guess correctly what is the > contention point there. Then I guess I need to reproduce and do more > digging why the contention happens... Hmm... what if we only recalculate the superblock checksum when we do a commit, via the callback function from the jbd2 layer to file system? - Ted