linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	rcampbell@nvidia.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, hughd@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	hch@infradead.org, bskeggs@redhat.com, jgg@nvidia.com,
	shakeelb@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com, willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 06/10] mm/memory.c: Allow different return codes for copy_nonpresent_pte()
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 11:19:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YL+KjaB4fCt/xodJ@t490s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210607075855.5084-7-apopple@nvidia.com>

On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 05:58:51PM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
> Currently if copy_nonpresent_pte() returns a non-zero value it is
> assumed to be a swap entry which requires further processing outside the
> loop in copy_pte_range() after dropping locks. This prevents other
> values being returned to signal conditions such as failure which a
> subsequent change requires.
> 
> Instead make copy_nonpresent_pte() return an error code if further
> processing is required and read the value for the swap entry in the main
> loop under the ptl.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> v10:
> 
> Use a unique error code and only check return codes for handling.
> 
> v9:
> 
> New for v9 to allow device exclusive handling to occur in
> copy_nonpresent_pte().
> ---
>  mm/memory.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 2fb455c365c2..0982cab37ecb 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ copy_nonpresent_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct *src_mm,
>  
>  	if (likely(!non_swap_entry(entry))) {
>  		if (swap_duplicate(entry) < 0)
> -			return entry.val;
> +			return -EIO;
>  
>  		/* make sure dst_mm is on swapoff's mmlist. */
>  		if (unlikely(list_empty(&dst_mm->mmlist))) {
> @@ -974,11 +974,13 @@ copy_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma,
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  		if (unlikely(!pte_present(*src_pte))) {
> -			entry.val = copy_nonpresent_pte(dst_mm, src_mm,
> -							dst_pte, src_pte,
> -							src_vma, addr, rss);
> -			if (entry.val)
> +			ret = copy_nonpresent_pte(dst_mm, src_mm,
> +						dst_pte, src_pte,
> +						src_vma, addr, rss);
> +			if (ret == -EIO) {
> +				entry = pte_to_swp_entry(*src_pte);
>  				break;
> +			}
>  			progress += 8;
>  			continue;
>  		}
> @@ -1011,20 +1013,24 @@ copy_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma,
>  	pte_unmap_unlock(orig_dst_pte, dst_ptl);
>  	cond_resched();
>  
> -	if (entry.val) {
> +	if (ret == -EIO) {
> +		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!entry.val);
>  		if (add_swap_count_continuation(entry, GFP_KERNEL) < 0) {
>  			ret = -ENOMEM;
>  			goto out;
>  		}
>  		entry.val = 0;
> -	} else if (ret) {
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(ret != -EAGAIN);
> +	} else if (ret ==  -EAGAIN) {
                          ^
                          |----------------------------- one more space here

>  		prealloc = page_copy_prealloc(src_mm, src_vma, addr);
>  		if (!prealloc)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> -		/* We've captured and resolved the error. Reset, try again. */
> -		ret = 0;
> +	} else if (ret) {
> +		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>  	}
> +
> +	/* We've captured and resolved the error. Reset, try again. */

Maybe better as:

      /*
       * We've resolved all error even if there is, reset error code and try
       * again if necessary.
       */

as it also covers the no-error path.  But I guess not a big deal..

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

Thanks,

> +	ret = 0;
> +
>  	if (addr != end)
>  		goto again;
>  out:
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

-- 
Peter Xu


  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-08 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-07  7:58 [PATCH v10 00/10] Add support for SVM atomics in Nouveau Alistair Popple
2021-06-07  7:58 ` [PATCH v10 01/10] mm: Remove special swap entry functions Alistair Popple
2021-06-07  7:58 ` [PATCH v10 02/10] mm/swapops: Rework swap entry manipulation code Alistair Popple
2021-06-07  7:58 ` [PATCH v10 03/10] mm/rmap: Split try_to_munlock from try_to_unmap Alistair Popple
2021-06-07  7:58 ` [PATCH v10 04/10] mm/rmap: Split migration into its own function Alistair Popple
2021-06-07  7:58 ` [PATCH v10 05/10] mm: Rename migrate_pgmap_owner Alistair Popple
2021-06-08 15:16   ` Peter Xu
2021-06-07  7:58 ` [PATCH v10 06/10] mm/memory.c: Allow different return codes for copy_nonpresent_pte() Alistair Popple
2021-06-08 15:19   ` Peter Xu [this message]
2021-06-07  7:58 ` [PATCH v10 07/10] mm: Device exclusive memory access Alistair Popple
2021-06-08 18:33   ` Peter Xu
2021-06-09  9:38     ` Alistair Popple
2021-06-09 16:05       ` Peter Xu
2021-06-10  0:18         ` Alistair Popple
2021-06-10 18:04           ` Peter Xu
2021-06-10 14:21             ` Alistair Popple
2021-06-10 23:04               ` Peter Xu
2021-06-10 23:17                 ` Alistair Popple
2021-06-11  1:00                   ` Peter Xu
2021-06-11  3:43                     ` Alistair Popple
2021-06-11 15:01                       ` Peter Xu
2021-06-15  3:08                         ` Alistair Popple
2021-06-15 16:25                           ` Peter Xu
2021-06-16  2:47                             ` Alistair Popple
2021-06-07  7:58 ` [PATCH v10 08/10] mm: Selftests for exclusive device memory Alistair Popple
2021-06-07  7:58 ` [PATCH v10 09/10] nouveau/svm: Refactor nouveau_range_fault Alistair Popple
2021-06-07  7:58 ` [PATCH v10 10/10] nouveau/svm: Implement atomic SVM access Alistair Popple

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YL+KjaB4fCt/xodJ@t490s \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).