[PATCH v2] kprobes: remove duplicated strong free_insn_page in x86 and s390

[PATCH v2] kprobes: remove duplicated strong free_insn_page in x86 and s390

[Barry Song]

free_insn_page() in x86 and s390 are same with the common weak function
in kernel/kprobes.c.
Plus, the comment "Recover page to RW mode before releasing it" in x86
seems insensible to be there since resetting mapping is done by common
code in vfree() of module_memfree().
So drop these two duplicated strong functions and related comment, then
mark the common one in kernel/kprobes.c strong.

Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
---
 -v2:
 remove free_insn_page in s390 as well and remove the __weak in common
 code according to Christoph's comment;

 arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c     | 5 -----
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 6 ------
 kernel/kprobes.c               | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c
index aae24dc75df6..60cfbd24229b 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -44,11 +44,6 @@ void *alloc_insn_page(void)
 	return page;
 }
 
-void free_insn_page(void *page)
-{
-	module_memfree(page);
-}
-
 static void *alloc_s390_insn_page(void)
 {
 	if (xchg(&insn_page_in_use, 1) == 1)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index d3d65545cb8b..3bce67d3a03c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -422,12 +422,6 @@ void *alloc_insn_page(void)
 	return page;
 }
 
-/* Recover page to RW mode before releasing it */
-void free_insn_page(void *page)
-{
-	module_memfree(page);
-}
-
 /* Kprobe x86 instruction emulation - only regs->ip or IF flag modifiers */
 
 static void kprobe_emulate_ifmodifiers(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 745f08fdd7a6..ddb643f3879f 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ void __weak *alloc_insn_page(void)
 	return module_alloc(PAGE_SIZE);
 }
 
-void __weak free_insn_page(void *page)
+void free_insn_page(void *page)
 {
 	module_memfree(page);
 }
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v2] kprobes: remove duplicated strong free_insn_page in x86 and s390

[Christoph Hellwig]

Please also mark free_insn_page static now.

Re: [PATCH v2] kprobes: remove duplicated strong free_insn_page in x86 and s390

[Heiko Carstens]

On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 09:18:54PM +1200, Barry Song wrote:
> free_insn_page() in x86 and s390 are same with the common weak function
> in kernel/kprobes.c.
> Plus, the comment "Recover page to RW mode before releasing it" in x86
> seems insensible to be there since resetting mapping is done by common
> code in vfree() of module_memfree().
> So drop these two duplicated strong functions and related comment, then
> mark the common one in kernel/kprobes.c strong.
> 
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
> ---
>  -v2:
>  remove free_insn_page in s390 as well and remove the __weak in common
>  code according to Christoph's comment;
> 
>  arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c     | 5 -----
>  arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 6 ------
>  kernel/kprobes.c               | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)

For the s390 part:
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>

Re: [PATCH v2] kprobes: remove duplicated strong free_insn_page in x86 and s390

[Masami Hiramatsu]

On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 21:18:54 +1200
Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> wrote:

> free_insn_page() in x86 and s390 are same with the common weak function
> in kernel/kprobes.c.
> Plus, the comment "Recover page to RW mode before releasing it" in x86
> seems insensible to be there since resetting mapping is done by common
> code in vfree() of module_memfree().
> So drop these two duplicated strong functions and related comment, then
> mark the common one in kernel/kprobes.c strong.

Hm, OK. Actually riscv and arm64 uses __vmalloc() but anyway
since module_memfree() calls vfree(). So it has no problem.

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Thank you,

> 
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
> ---
>  -v2:
>  remove free_insn_page in s390 as well and remove the __weak in common
>  code according to Christoph's comment;
> 
>  arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c     | 5 -----
>  arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 6 ------
>  kernel/kprobes.c               | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c
> index aae24dc75df6..60cfbd24229b 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -44,11 +44,6 @@ void *alloc_insn_page(void)
>  	return page;
>  }
>  
> -void free_insn_page(void *page)
> -{
> -	module_memfree(page);
> -}
> -
>  static void *alloc_s390_insn_page(void)
>  {
>  	if (xchg(&insn_page_in_use, 1) == 1)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> index d3d65545cb8b..3bce67d3a03c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> @@ -422,12 +422,6 @@ void *alloc_insn_page(void)
>  	return page;
>  }
>  
> -/* Recover page to RW mode before releasing it */
> -void free_insn_page(void *page)
> -{
> -	module_memfree(page);
> -}
> -
>  /* Kprobe x86 instruction emulation - only regs->ip or IF flag modifiers */
>  
>  static void kprobe_emulate_ifmodifiers(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 745f08fdd7a6..ddb643f3879f 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ void __weak *alloc_insn_page(void)
>  	return module_alloc(PAGE_SIZE);
>  }
>  
> -void __weak free_insn_page(void *page)
> +void free_insn_page(void *page)
>  {
>  	module_memfree(page);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>