From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@gmail.com>,
Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: core: Support new usage_power setting in PWM state
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:11:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMIPjGtYfby6ZXKl@orome.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210609204144.nkksqjovs2yqfiyo@pengutronix.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1036 bytes --]
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 10:41:44PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Thierry,
>
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 08:51:58PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > My problem is not that in the end a solution is picked that wasn't my
> > favourite. My problem is that I have the impression my arguments were
> > not considered but simply ignored.
>
> Another thing that annoys me is that there are currently ~20 open
> patches by me in patchwork, most of them are easy to understand cleanups
> and fixes, most of them are older than Clemens' series and most of them
> are uncommented by you. And in this situation you apply the only
> controversial series.
Clemens' series is actually older than those cleanups because it's been
in the works for many months now. And the reason why I'm prioritizing
Clemens' series is because it has broader impact and I want to make sure
it gets maximum soaking time in linux-next. Small fixes and cleanups are
less likely to break things, so I'm going to apply them after.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-10 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-07 13:18 [PATCH 1/4] pwm: core: Support new usage_power setting in PWM state Clemens Gruber
2021-05-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] pwm: pca9685: " Clemens Gruber
2021-05-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] pwm: pca9685: Restrict period change for enabled PWMs Clemens Gruber
2021-05-07 13:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] pwm: pca9685: Add error messages for failed regmap calls Clemens Gruber
2021-05-07 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] pwm: core: Support new usage_power setting in PWM state Uwe Kleine-König
2021-05-07 15:47 ` Clemens Gruber
2021-05-07 23:18 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-05-31 16:12 ` Clemens Gruber
2021-06-04 9:49 ` Thierry Reding
2021-06-07 6:08 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-07 14:40 ` Thierry Reding
2021-06-07 18:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-09 20:41 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-10 13:11 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2021-06-21 6:47 ` PWM-Patches for next merge window [Was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: core: Support new usage_power setting in PWM] state Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-25 9:55 ` PWM-Patches for next merge window Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-04 9:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] pwm: core: Support new usage_power setting in PWM state Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YMIPjGtYfby6ZXKl@orome.fritz.box \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=TheSven73@gmail.com \
--cc=clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).