From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] iomap: Use __set_page_dirty_nobuffers
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:50:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMmfQNjExNs3cuyq@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YMjtvLkHQ8sZ/CPS@casper.infradead.org>
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 07:13:16PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 07:34:53PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 06:32:37PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 07:19:59PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 05:23:39PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> > > > Using __ functions in structures in different modules feels odd to me.
> > > > Why not just have iomap_set_page_dirty be a #define to this function now
> > > > if you want to do this?
> > > >
> > > > Or take the __ off of the function name?
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, logic here is fine, but feels odd.
> > >
> > > heh, that was how I did it the first time. Then I thought that it was
> > > better to follow Christoph's patch:
> > >
> > > static const struct address_space_operations adfs_aops = {
> > > + .set_page_dirty = __set_page_dirty_buffers,
> > > (etc)
> >
> > Eventually everything around set_page_dirty should be changed to operate
> > on folios, and that will be a good time to come up with a sane
> > naming scheme without introducing extra churn.
>
> The way it currently looks in my tree ...
>
> set_page_dirty(page) is a thin wrapper that calls folio_mark_dirty(folio).
> folio_mark_dirty() calls a_ops->dirty_folio(mapping, folio) (which
> returns bool).
> __set_page_dirty_nobuffers() becomes filemap_dirty_folio()
> __set_page_dirty_buffers() becomes block_dirty_folio()
> __set_page_dirty_no_writeback() becomes dirty_folio_no_writeback()
>
> Now I look at it, maybe that last should be nowb_dirty_folio().
Not to be a pain, but you are mixing "folio" at the front and back of
the api name? We messed up in the driver core with this for some things
(get_device() being one), I would recommend just sticking with one
naming scheme now as you are getting to pick what you want to use.
So perhaps for the above:
folio_mark_dirty()
folio_dirty_no_writeback()
folio_dirty_filemap()
folio_dirty_block()
much like "set_page" is used today?
Anyway, just bikeshedding, it's your code, your choice :)
thanks for doing this work overall.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-16 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-15 16:23 [PATCH 0/6] Further set_page_dirty cleanups Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-06-15 16:23 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/writeback: Move __set_page_dirty() to core mm Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-06-15 16:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 17:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-16 16:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-15 16:23 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/writeback: Use __set_page_dirty in __set_page_dirty_nobuffers Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-06-15 16:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 17:18 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-15 16:23 ` [PATCH 3/6] iomap: Use __set_page_dirty_nobuffers Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-06-15 16:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 17:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-15 17:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-15 17:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 18:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-15 18:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-16 6:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2021-06-16 16:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-16 16:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-15 16:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] fs: Remove anon_set_page_dirty() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-06-15 16:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-15 16:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] fs: Remove noop_set_page_dirty() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-06-15 16:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-16 18:10 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-16 18:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-16 22:33 ` kernel test robot
2021-06-15 16:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm: Move page dirtying prototypes from mm.h Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-06-15 16:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YMmfQNjExNs3cuyq@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).