From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625E3C48BDF for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 15:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C2A61369 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 15:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232835AbhFRPC3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 11:02:29 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.220.29]:38022 "EHLO smtp-out2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230413AbhFRPC1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 11:02:27 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4451FDE7; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 15:00:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1624028417; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Y8ZaQr3Hg1tmY1ESaXoN1rX1Z4G2ErKX/EaIfe+IuhQ=; b=ZcjDJOYNYKJV9h03ZWEC5o81xjvFgBZYNKm68ZM0Xq9O+b33+sIc3kFUNb2RYMS4bmRzk3 VgreMKS30kzMXO/2ba+vuJNsS5zEuzdwazhlVW/HunqfvxVDhqDHc/EsC5Haakkad7LgRZ F6JC7adnk+qUPWEorRfCNXXPonjt9yM= Received: from suse.cz (unknown [10.100.224.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B86CA3B9F; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 15:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 17:00:16 +0200 From: Petr Mladek To: Chris Down Cc: kernel test robot , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Jessica Yu , Sergey Senozhatsky , John Ogness , Steven Rostedt , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Johannes Weiner , Kees Cook , Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/5] printk: Userspace format indexing support Message-ID: References: <202106181930.0rU3pZgm-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 2021-06-18 13:19:41, Chris Down wrote: > kernel test robot writes: > > > > include/linux/printk.h:219:5: error: static declaration of '_printk' follows non-static declaration > > This issue already exists before this patch and has done for a very long > time, just the error message changed. Let's fix it in a different series. It is build when CONFIG_PRINTK is not set. Do I get it correctly? Yes, I agree that it is an older problem and we could fix it later. Best Regards, Petr