linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Benjamin Segall" <bsegall@google.com>,
	"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"Daniel Bristot de Oliveira" <bristot@redhat.com>,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, "Minchan Kim" <minchan@google.com>,
	"Tim Murray" <timmurray@google.com>,
	"YT Chang" <yt.chang@mediatek.com>,
	"Wenju Xu (许文举)" <wenju.xu@mediatek.com>,
	"Jonathan JMChen (陳家明)" <jonathan.jmchen@mediatek.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	kernel-team <kernel-team@android.com>,
	"SH Chen" <show-hong.chen@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] psi: stop relying on timer_pending for poll_work rescheduling
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 11:28:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YN7cJZOZzjYJFClR@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpFKDhcgjU=MGsz+JuetrWvYCe0EL3FMp91zopH+8T=mMQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 09:28:04AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 9:12 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 09:09:25AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 1:59 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 01:51:51PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > > +     /* cmpxchg should be called even when !force to set poll_scheduled */
> > > > > +     if (atomic_cmpxchg(&group->poll_scheduled, 0, 1) && !force)
> > > > >               return;
> > > >
> > > > Why is that a cmpxchg() ?
> > >
> > > We want to set poll_scheduled and proceed with rescheduling the timer
> > > unless it's already scheduled, so cmpxchg helps us to make that
> > > decision atomically. Or did I misunderstand your question?
> >
> > What's wrong with: atomic_xchg(&group->poll_scheduled, 1) ?
> 
> Yes, since poll_scheduled can be only 0 or 1 atomic_xchg should work
> fine here. Functionally equivalent but I assume atomic_xchg() is more
> efficient due to no comparison.

Mostly conceptually simpler; the cmpxchg-on-0 makes that you have to
check if there's ever any state outside of {0,1}. The xchg() thing is
the classical test-and-set pattern.

On top of all that, the cmpxchg() can fail, which brings ordering
issues.

Typically, I think, you want to ensure that everything that happens
before psi_schedule_poll_work() is visible to the work when it runs
(also see Johannes' email). In case poll_scheduled is already 1, the
cmpxchg will fail and *NOT* provide that ordering. Meaning the work
might not observe the latest changes. xchg() doesn't have this subtlety.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-02  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-30 20:51 [PATCH v2 1/1] psi: stop relying on timer_pending for poll_work rescheduling Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-06-30 22:04 ` Johannes Weiner
2021-07-01  8:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-01 16:09   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-07-01 16:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-07-01 16:28       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-07-02  9:28         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-07-02 15:49           ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-07-07  2:42             ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2021-07-01 16:39   ` Johannes Weiner
2021-07-01 17:46     ` Suren Baghdasaryan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YN7cJZOZzjYJFClR@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jonathan.jmchen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=minchan@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=show-hong.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=timmurray@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=wenju.xu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yt.chang@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).