From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>,
Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Honggang LI <honli@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 rdma-next] RDMA/mlx5: Enable Relaxed Ordering by default for kernel ULPs
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:38:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNQoY7MRdYMNAUPg@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c5b7ae5-8578-3008-5e78-02e77e121cda@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 02:06:46AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>
> On 6/9/2021 2:05 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>
> >
> > Relaxed Ordering is a capability that can only benefit users that support
> > it. All kernel ULPs should support Relaxed Ordering, as they are designed
> > to read data only after observing the CQE and use the DMA API correctly.
> >
> > Hence, implicitly enable Relaxed Ordering by default for kernel ULPs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > Changelog:
> > v2:
> > * Dropped IB/core patch and set RO implicitly in mlx5 exactly like in
> > eth side of mlx5 driver.
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1621505111.git.leonro@nvidia.com
> > * Enabled by default RO in IB/core instead of changing all users
> > v0: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210405052404.213889-1-leon@kernel.org
> > ---
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c | 10 ++++++----
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/wr.c | 5 ++++-
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> > index 3363cde85b14..2182e76ae734 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> > @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ static void set_mkc_access_pd_addr_fields(void *mkc, int acc, u64 start_addr,
> > struct ib_pd *pd)
> > {
> > struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev = to_mdev(pd->device);
> > + bool ro_pci_enabled = pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(dev->mdev->pdev);
> > MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, a, !!(acc & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC));
> > MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, rw, !!(acc & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE));
> > @@ -78,10 +79,10 @@ static void set_mkc_access_pd_addr_fields(void *mkc, int acc, u64 start_addr,
> > if (MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev->mdev, relaxed_ordering_write))
> > MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_write,
> > - !!(acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING));
> > + acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING && ro_pci_enabled);
> > if (MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev->mdev, relaxed_ordering_read))
> > MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_read,
> > - !!(acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING));
> > + acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING && ro_pci_enabled);
>
> Jason,
>
> If it's still possible to add small change, it will be nice to avoid
> calculating "acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING && ro_pci_enabled" twice.
The patch is part of for-next now, so feel free to send followup patch.
Thanks
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
index c1e70c99b70c..c4f246c90c4d 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
@@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ static void set_mkc_access_pd_addr_fields(void *mkc, int acc, u64 start_addr,
struct ib_pd *pd)
{
struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev = to_mdev(pd->device);
- bool ro_pci_enabled = pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(dev->mdev->pdev);
+ bool ro_pci_enabled = acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING &&
+ pcie_relaxed_ordering_enabled(dev->mdev->pdev);
MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, a, !!(acc & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC));
MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, rw, !!(acc & IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE));
@@ -78,11 +79,9 @@ static void set_mkc_access_pd_addr_fields(void *mkc, int acc, u64 start_addr,
MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, lr, 1);
if (MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev->mdev, relaxed_ordering_write))
- MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_write,
- (acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING) && ro_pci_enabled);
+ MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_write, ro_pci_enabled);
if (MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev->mdev, relaxed_ordering_read))
- MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_read,
- (acc & IB_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING) && ro_pci_enabled);
+ MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, relaxed_ordering_read, ro_pci_enabled);
MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, pd, to_mpd(pd)->pdn);
MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, qpn, 0xffffff);
(END)
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-24 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-09 11:05 [PATCH v2 rdma-next] RDMA/mlx5: Enable Relaxed Ordering by default for kernel ULPs Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-09 12:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-09 13:53 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-09 13:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-10 7:44 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-09 14:10 ` David Laight
2021-06-09 14:37 ` Chuck Lever III
2021-06-09 15:05 ` David Laight
2021-06-09 15:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-09 15:48 ` David Laight
2021-06-21 18:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-21 20:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-21 23:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-22 6:20 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-23 23:06 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-06-24 6:38 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2021-06-24 7:39 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-06-24 11:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-06-27 7:32 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-06-27 7:30 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YNQoY7MRdYMNAUPg@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=honli@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).