From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70AEFC2B9F4 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5469C6197C for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231446AbhFYNub (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:50:31 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:43538 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229498AbhFYNu1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:50:27 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0dae0049fb297996de39ad.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0d:ae00:49fb:2979:96de:39ad]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 0C3831EC0595; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 15:48:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1624628886; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=iY+4utBdvbx+ojYEWBGu3aTvmIrU2MDnkCirQ/h45y0=; b=sJIIfGoaIlKF0q5NM0/Y3eu3t9dBe/4iKRyybKWdVdhn1NcOOcJvL6ACdxBFvGLVmGXxxe R1gmkNL3w8sC/r5mmiYb43/2nZqOpW5Ygkv7YB7QqkddB+oRJww/MVmD9YUqQ8CQjtpuW8 /WDDSBk+MqSKzLKBCHt5Uwn651aItPg= Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 15:47:59 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Kai Huang Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen , linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, seanjc@google.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, Yang Zhong Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/sgx: Add missing xa_destroy() when virtual EPC is destroyed Message-ID: References: <20210616003634.320206-1-kai.huang@intel.com> <20210623132844.heleuoxogrpz3cpm@kernel.org> <925090f035b8e749ea7aca8c857690c8afba7349.camel@intel.com> <6df0600b755ca067a6c4ff82af47297feafa088a.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6df0600b755ca067a6c4ff82af47297feafa088a.camel@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:04:53AM +1200, Kai Huang wrote: > Oh sorry I thought the patch would go via x86/sgx branch We usually send fixes through tip's urgent branches because they go straight to Linus and not wait for the merge window. > and I didn't monitor the tip-bot2 mail which was moved to my local x86 > folder. That's not optimal because those tip-bot notifications are *exactly* for that - to let the involved parties know that the patch has been queued. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette